Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608919›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Reimagining the Path of an Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Application: A Survey of Program Directors.

Stewart A Bryant, Achraf H Jardaly, Brent A Ponce, S Trent Guthrie, Harris Slone, Jeremy R Bruce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stewart A BryantDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-8341
Achraf H JardalyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2779-9994
Brent A PonceDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Hughston Foundation, Columbus, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8925-540X
S Trent GuthrieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-493X
Harris SloneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Jeremy R BruceDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-1412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few evidence-based suggestions are available to help applicants and mentors improve reapplication outcomes. We sought to provide program directors' (PDs) perspectives on actionable steps to improve reapplicants' chances for a match. Methods: The PDs were asked to rank positions unmatched applicants can pursue, steps these applicants can take for the next application cycle, and reasons why reapplicants do not match. Results: Responses from 66 of 123 PDs were received (53.6% response rate). Obtaining new recommendation letters and rotating with orthopaedics were the highest 20 ranked steps unmatched applicants can take. No curriculum vitae (CV) improvement, poor interview, and poor letters of recommendation were the most important reasons hindering applicants from matching when reapplying. Conclusions: Steps reapplicants could prioritize include obtaining new recommendation letters, rotating in orthopaedics, and producing new research items. CV strengthening and improving interview skills address the 2 main reasons why unmatched applicants failed in subsequent attempts. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Identifiers

PMID37608919
PMCPMC10438795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.