Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608916›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Safety, Reactogenicity, Immunogenicity, and Dose Selection of 10-Valent Extraintestinal Pathogenic

Carlos A Fierro, Michal Sarnecki, Joachim Doua, Bart Spiessens, Oscar Go, Todd A Davies, Germie van den Dobbelsteen, Jan Poolman, Darren Abbanat, Wouter Haazen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A cynomolgus monkeyInfection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Carlos A FierroJohnson County Clin-Trials, Lenexa, Kansas, USA.
Michal SarneckiInfectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Research and Development, Janssen Vaccines, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7035-0020
Joachim DouaInfectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Research and Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
Bart SpiessensInfectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Research and Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
Oscar GoJanssen Research and Development, Raritan, New Jersey, USA.
Todd A DaviesJanssen Research and Development, Raritan, New Jersey, USA.
Germie van den DobbelsteenBacterial Vaccines Discovery and Early Development, Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan PoolmanBacterial Vaccines Discovery and Early Development, Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
Darren AbbanatJanssen Research and Development, Raritan, New Jersey, USA.
Wouter HaazenInfectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Research and Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
Janssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (United States) · USHuman Vaccines Project Europe · NLJanssen (Switzerland) · CHJohnson County Clin-Trials (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: ExPEC10V is a bioconjugate vaccine containing O-antigen polysaccharides of 10 extraintestinal pathogenic Methods: The observer-blind, active-controlled design included a 28-day screening, vaccination, 181-day follow-up, and 1-year follow-up. Participants (60-85 years of age) were randomized to ExPEC10V low dose (antigen dose range, 4-8 µg), ExPEC10V medium dose (4-16 µg), or ExPEC10V high dose (8-16 µg); 4-valent ExPEC vaccine (ExPEC4V); or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). The incidence of adverse events (AEs; solicited, day 15; unsolicited, day 30; serious AEs, day 181) and immunogenicity (electrochemiluminescent-based assay [ECL] and multiplex opsonophagocytic assay [MOPA]) were assessed. Optimal ExPEC10V dose was determined from safety data through day 30 and an immunogenicity dose selection algorithm based on day 15 ECL and MOPA results. Results: A total of 416 participants were included (median age, 64.0 years; 54.8% female). The incidences of solicited local and systemic AEs were, respectively, 44.2% and 39.4% for low-dose, 52.9% and 46.1% for medium-dose, 57.7% and 45.2% for high-dose ExPEC10V, and 74.1% and 48.1% for PCV13. Five serious AEs, not vaccine related, were reported. The ECL revealed a robust antibody response to ExPEC10V through year 1. Opsonophagocytic killing activity was detected against all but serotype O8; this lack of response against serotype O8 was linked to low assay sensitivity. Based on the totality of data, high-dose ExPEC10V was considered optimal. Conclusions: ExPEC10V was well tolerated and immunogenic in elderly adults against all but serotype O8.

Indexed as

bacteremiaE coliextraintestinal pathogenic E coliinvasive E coli diseasevaccine

Identifiers

PMID37608916
PMCPMC10442062
OpenAlexW4385778465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.