Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608857›Full record

ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2021

Regulation of orthopaedic devices: Future implications for research and innovation.

Claire A Donnelley, Vincent J Devlin, Mitchel B Harris, Robert A Poggie, Roy W Sanders, Saam Morshed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire A DonnelleyInstitute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Vincent J DevlinOffice of Health Technology 6, Office of Orthopedic Device, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Mitchel B HarrisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Robert A PoggieBioVera Inc. Notre-Dame-de-L'lle-Perrot, Quebec, Canada.
Roy W SandersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Florida/Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, FL.
Saam MorshedInstitute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conception-to-market development of orthopaedic devices occurs across the total product life cycle including device design and preclinical testing, clinical investigations to support marketing applications, and monitoring of device performance after market introduction. This process involves industry, regulatory agencies, health care providers, engineers, scientists, and patients. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for regulating medical devices in the United States, and uses a 3-tier classification system based on the level of control necessary to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification directs the required regulatory pathway and premarket submission type. Variations in global regulations, particularly between the United States, European Economic Area (EEA), and the United Kingdom (UK), may impact industry response to orthopaedic device development. Changing device innovation and reimbursement models have led to the consolidation of market share among larger companies. Although larger companies are better able to cope with more rigorous regulatory requirements, this leads to decreased competition and increased upward price pressure. To assist with the complex regulatory processes, the FDA offers pre-submission assistance as an opportunity for early collaboration and discussion about the medical device or device-led combination product submissions. Orthopaedic organizations, such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), may assist in postmarket device surveillance through the coordinated development and maintenance of clinical data registries. Such registries can longitudinally follow patients with a specific orthopaedic pathology or device usage, and monitor outcomes towards improvements in next-generation device development. As technology evolves, the nexus of regulation, industry, and patient outcome monitoring will continue to support safe and effective device innovation.

Indexed as

data registriesdevice InnovationMedical device regulationorthopaedic industryregulatory testing

Identifiers

PMID37608857
PMCPMC10441672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.