Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608740›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2024

Asynchronous development of memory integration and differentiation influences temporal memory organization.

Christine Coughlin, Athula Pudhiyidath, Hannah E Roome, Nicole L Varga, Kim V Nguyen, Alison R Preston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine CoughlinCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0302-2075
Athula PudhiyidathCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Hannah E RoomeCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Nicole L VargaCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Kim V NguyenCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Alison R PrestonCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

Hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to memory integrationR01MH100121 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alison R Preston · 2013 to 2026
$7.3M
Training in Learning and MemoryT32MH106454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
Linking the neurobiological development of memory and reasoningR21HD083785 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2016 to 2017
$423k
Influence of brain maturation on memory representation during developmentF32HD095586 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI VARGA, NICOLE LEIGH · 2018 to 2021
$228k
Memory development and its influence on reasoning and prospectionF32MH115585 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI COUGHLIN, CHRISTINE A · 2017 to 2018
$116k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD095586NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD083785NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH115585NIMH NIH HHS F32MH115585NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100121NIMH NIH HHS R01MH100121NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH106454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adults remember items with shared contexts as occurring closer in time to one another than those associated with different contexts, even when their objective temporal distance is fixed. Such temporal memory biases are thought to reflect within-event integration and between-event differentiation processes that organize events according to their contextual similarities and differences, respectively. Within-event integration and between-event differentiation are hypothesized to differentially rely on binding and control processes, which may develop at different ages. To test this hypothesis, 5- to 12-year-olds and adults (N = 134) studied quartets of image pairs that contained either the same scene (same-context) or different scenes (different-context). Participants remembered same-context items as occurring closer in time by older childhood (7-9 years), whereas different-context items were remembered as occurring farther apart by early adolescence (10-12 years). The differential emergence of these temporal memory biases suggests within-event integration and between-event differentiation emerge at different ages. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Children are less likely than adults to use contextual information (e.g., location) to organize their continuous experience in memory, as indicated by temporal memory biases. Biases reflecting within-event integration (i.e., remembering elements with a shared context as occurring closer together in time) emerged in late childhood. Biases reflecting between-event differentiation (i.e., remembering elements from different contexts as occurring farther apart in time) emerged in early adolescence. The differential emergence of biases reflecting within-event integration and between-event differentiation suggests they are distinct, yet complementary, processes that support developmental improvements in event memory organization.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicMental RecallAdolescentAdultChildHumansassociative bindingcontextcontrol processesepisodic memoryevent segmentationtemporal cognition

Identifiers

PMID37608740
PMCPMC10884351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.