Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608427›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2023

High expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) distinguishes colorectal mixed and pure neuroendocrine carcinomas from conventional adenocarcinomas with diffuse expression of synaptophysin.

Anne-Sophie Litmeyer, Björn Konukiewitz, Atsuko Kasajima, Sebastian Foersch, Felix Schicktanz, Maxime Schmitt, Franziska Kellers, Albert Grass, Paul Jank, Bettina Lehman and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. mAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne-Sophie Litmeyer *Institute of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Björn Konukiewitz *Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Atsuko KasajimaInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian FoerschInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Felix SchicktanzInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maxime SchmittInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franziska KellersDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Albert GrassInstitute of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Paul JankInstitute of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-0476
Bettina LehmanDepartment of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Thomas M GressDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Anja RinkeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Detlef K BartschDepartment of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Günter KlöppelInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-5661
Phillips University · USTechnical University of Munich · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary to synaptophysin and chromogranin A, insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Since there are no comparative data regarding INSM1 expression in conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs) and colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas/neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs/NECs), we examined INSM1 in a large cohort of conventional CRCs and MANECs/NECs. In conventional CRC, we put a special focus on conventional CRC with diffuse expression of synaptophysin, which carry the risk of being misinterpreted as a MANEC or a NEC. We investigated INSM1 according to the immunoreactive score in our main cohort of 1,033 conventional CRCs and 21 MANECs/NECs in comparison to the expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A and correlated the results with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. All MANECs/NECs expressed INSM1, usually showing high or moderate expression (57% high, 34% moderate, and 9% low), which distinguished them from conventional CRCs, which were usually INSM1 negative or low, even if they diffusely expressed synaptophysin. High expression of INSM1 was not observed in conventional CRCs. Chromogranin A was negative/low in most conventional CRCs (99%), but also in most MANECs/NECs (66%). Comparable results were observed in our independent validation cohorts of conventional CRC (n = 274) and MANEC/NEC (n = 19). Similar to synaptophysin, INSM1 expression had no prognostic relevance in conventional CRCs, while true MANEC/NEC showed a highly impaired survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (e.g. disease-specific survival: p < 0.001). MANECs/NECs are a highly aggressive variant of colorectal cancer, which must be reliably identified. High expression of INSM1 distinguishes MANEC/NEC from conventional CRCs with diffuse expression of the standard neuroendocrine marker synaptophysin, which do not share the same dismal prognosis. Therefore, high INSM1 expression is a highly specific/sensitive marker that is supportive for the diagnosis of true colorectal MANEC/NEC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineColorectal NeoplasmsRepressor ProteinsSynaptophysinAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChromogranin ADiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin AINSM1 protein, humanRepressor ProteinsSynaptophysinSYP protein, humancolorectal carcinomaconventional adenocarcinomaINSM1neuroendocrine carcinomasynaptophysin

Identifiers

PMID37608427
PMCPMC10556265
OpenAlexW4386083743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.