Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608385›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2023

Comparative efficacy of oral drugs for chronic radiation proctitis - a systematic review.

Liangzhe Liu, Nana Xiao, Jinjun Liang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06837597 (Jianzhong Qushi Formula for Treating Chronic Radiation Induced Proctitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06837597 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Jianzhong Qushi Formula for Treating Chronic Radiation Induced Proctitis : a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2025 to 2029Enrolled168ConditionsChronic Radiation ProctitisArmsJianzhong Qushi Formula, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liangzhe LiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Nana XiaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinjun LiangDepartment of Surgery, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medical, Guangzhou, China. 2019620402@gzhmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2852-4642
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a long-term complication of pelvic radiotherapy that manifests as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, fistula formation and obstruction. Treatments such as endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and rectal topical formalin have imposed a significant medical burden on CRP patients. In contrast, oral therapies offer a more accessible and acceptable option for managing CRP. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of oral treatments for CRP to assess their potential as an effective and convenient treatment option for this condition.

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese VIP in February 2021. We included post-radiotherapy participants with CRP that compared oral medicine alone or in combination with other treatments versus control treatments. The primary outcomes were bleeding, diarrhoea and symptom score. Heterogeneity between studies was checked using Cochrane Q test statistics and I

resultsWe included 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 retrospective study with 898 participants. Three placebo-controlled trials evaluated the effects of oral sucralfate on CRP, with meta-analysis showing no significant different with placebo arm. Four trials on TCM demonstrated significant improvement of symptoms, especially for the 3 trials on oral TCM drinks. Retinyl palmitate and high-fibre diet were found to reduce rectal bleeding. The combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol did not significantly change the process of CRP.

conclusionsOur study implies that oral TCM drinks, retinyl palmitate and a high-fiber diet showed significant improvement in CRP symptoms, but not with the combination of oral pentoxifylline and tocopherol. Further multicentre, larger-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatments and optimize treatment strategies, ultimately improving the quality of life for patients with CRP.

Indexed as

PentoxifyllineProctitisDiarrheaDiterpenesHumansRetinyl EstersTocopherolsDiterpenesPentoxifyllineretinol palmitateRetinyl EstersTocopherolsChronic radiation proctitisDiarrhoeaOral treatmentsRadiation toxicityRectal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID37608385
PMCPMC10464232
OpenAlexW4386051068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.