Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608345›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention to improve information availability at the interface between inpatient and outpatient care in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy (HYPERION-TransCare) - study protocol for a pilot and feasibility cluster-randomized controlled trial in general practice in Germany.

Astrid-Alexandra Klein, Jenny Petermann, Franziska Brosse, Steve Piller, Martin Kramer, Maria Hanf, Truc Sophia Dinh, Sylvia Schulz-Rothe, Jennifer Engler, Karola Mergenthal and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Astrid-Alexandra KleinDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, Dresden Medical School, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. Astrid.Klein@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2446-5497
Jenny PetermannDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, Dresden Medical School, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Franziska BrosseDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, Dresden Medical School, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Steve PillerDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, Dresden Medical School, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Martin KramerDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, Dresden Medical School, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Maria HanfInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0269-1672
Truc Sophia DinhInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9774-6751
Sylvia Schulz-RotheInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Jennifer EnglerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6030-1513
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-9389
Hanna M SeidlingCooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-634X
Sophia KlasingCooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nina TimmesfeldDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 105, 44789, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5175-4326
Marjan van den AkkerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-8637
Karen VoigtDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, Dresden Medical School, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-7368
Goethe University Frankfurt · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GK1906A/01GK1906B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite attempts to improve the cross-sectoral flow of information, difficulties remain in routine healthcare. The resulting negative impact on continuity of care is often associated with poor health outcomes, especially in older patients. Our intervention aims to increase information availability with respect to medications and health conditions at the interface between inpatient and outpatient care and to contribute towards improving the quality of care in older patients. This pilot study focuses on feasibility and implementability.

methodsThe idea of the complex intervention has been developed in a previous study. This intervention will be tested in a prospective, multicenter, cluster-randomized (via web tool), controlled pilot trial with two parallel study arms (intervention and control group). The pilot study will be conducted in 20 general practices in Hesse and Saxony (Germany) and include 200 patients (≥ 65 years of age with multimorbidity and polypharmacy) recruited by the practices. Practice staff and patients will be blinded. We will use qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the feasibility and implementability of the intervention and the study design in a process evaluation covering topics ranging from expectations to experiences. In addition, the feasibility of proposed outcome parameters for the future definitive trial will be explored. The composite endpoint will include health-related patient outcomes (hospitalization, falls, and mortality using, e.g., the FIMA questionnaire), and we will assess information on medications (SIMS questionnaire), symptoms and side effects of the medication (pro-CTCAE questionnaire), and health literacy (HLQ questionnaire). Data will be collected at study begin (baseline) and after 6 months. Furthermore, the study will include surveys and interviews with patients, general practitioners, and healthcare assistants. DISCUSSION: The intervention was developed using a participatory approach involving stakeholders and patients. It aims to empower general practice teams as they provide patient-centered care and play a key role in the coordination and continuity of care. We aim to encourage patients to adopt an active role in their health care. Overall, we want to increase the availability of health-related information for patients and healthcare providers. The results of the pilot study will be used in the design and implementation of the future definitive trial.

trial registrationThe study was registered in DRKS-German Clinical Trials Register: registration number DRKS00027649 (date: 19 January 2022). Date and version identifier 10.07.2023; Version 1.3.

Indexed as

Continuity of careFamily practiceInformation availabilityInpatient and outpatient careMultimorbidityOlder patientsParticipationPilot projectsPolypharmacyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37608345
PMCPMC10463488
OpenAlexW4386048595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.