Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608344›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2023

Community capacity for prevention and health promotion: a scoping review on underlying domains and assessment methods.

Vera Birgel, Lea Decker, Dominik Röding, Ulla Walter

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vera BirgelHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany. birgel.vera@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8879-085X
Lea DeckerHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Dominik RödingHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Ulla WalterHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuilding community capacity is an essential health promotion approach, which refers to the characteristics of communities that affect their ability to identify and address social and public health problems. Despite general agreement about certain capacity domains and frameworks, there is no comprehensive and consistent assessment of community capacity. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to identify the domains and methods used to assess community capacity related to community-based prevention and health promotion.

methodsA scoping search was performed on 06/02/2022 via PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct, with supplemental searches via Google Scholar. The review included studies published in English from 1990 to 2022 that explicitly described how community capacity was assessed in health promotion and prevention interventions. Furthermore, studies had to meet at least two of the three following criteria for capacity assessment: a theoretical foundation, a participatory approach, or a field test of the assessment tool.

resultsFrom 4779 records, 38 studies were included after applying exclusion criteria. Nineteen studies used mixed, eleven qualitative and eight quantitative methods to assess community capacity. The various domains used to assess community capacity were identified and reassembled into nine comprehensive domains: community participation, knowledge and skills, resources, leadership, community power, sense of community, collaboration, critical awareness and problem-solving, and community structure. The review also identified four sub-domains, which include commitment, communication, shared values and goals, and sustainability. DISCUSSION: This scoping review provides an overview of the domains and methods used to assess community capacity, which can facilitate the development of a comprehensive approach to capacity assessment in future research.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPublic HealthCommunicationCommunity ParticipationHumansLeadershipCommunity capacityCommunity capacity assessmentCommunity interventionPrevention and health promotionScoping review

Identifiers

PMID37608344
PMCPMC10464111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.