Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608329›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2023

Machine learning based study for the classification of Type 2 diabetes mellitus subtypes.

Nelson E Ordoñez-Guillen, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Compean, Ivan Lopez-Arevalo, Miguel Contreras-Murillo, Edwin Aldana-Bobadilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nelson E Ordoñez-GuillenCinvestav Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Soto la Marina km 5.5, Victoria, 87130, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Jose Luis Gonzalez-CompeanCinvestav Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Soto la Marina km 5.5, Victoria, 87130, Tamaulipas, Mexico. joseluis.gonzalez@cinvestav.mx.
Ivan Lopez-ArevaloCinvestav Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Soto la Marina km 5.5, Victoria, 87130, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Miguel Contreras-MurilloCinvestav Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Soto la Marina km 5.5, Victoria, 87130, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Edwin Aldana-BobadillaCONAHCYT-Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Unidad Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Soto la Marina km 5.5, Victoria, Tamaulipas, 87130, Mexico.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Project FORDECYT-PRONACES No: 41756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData-driven diabetes research has increased its interest in exploring the heterogeneity of the disease, aiming to support in the development of more specific prognoses and treatments within the so-called precision medicine. Recently, one of these studies found five diabetes subgroups with varying risks of complications and treatment responses. Here, we tackle the development and assessment of different models for classifying Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) subtypes through machine learning approaches, with the aim of providing a performance comparison and new insights on the matter.

methodsWe developed a three-stage methodology starting with the preprocessing of public databases NHANES (USA) and ENSANUT (Mexico) to construct a dataset with N = 10,077 adult diabetes patient records. We used N = 2,768 records for training/validation of models and left the remaining (N = 7,309) for testing. In the second stage, groups of observations -each one representing a T2DM subtype- were identified. We tested different clustering techniques and strategies and validated them by using internal and external clustering indices; obtaining two annotated datasets Dset A and Dset B. In the third stage, we developed different classification models assaying four algorithms, seven input-data schemes, and two validation settings on each annotated dataset. We also tested the obtained models using a majority-vote approach for classifying unseen patient records in the hold-out dataset.

resultsFrom the independently obtained bootstrap validation for Dset A and Dset B, mean accuracies across all seven data schemes were [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]), respectively. Best accuracies were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Both validation setting results were consistent. For the hold-out dataset, results were consonant with most of those obtained in the literature in terms of class proportions.

conclusionThe development of machine learning systems for the classification of diabetes subtypes constitutes an important task to support physicians for fast and timely decision-making. We expect to deploy this methodology in a data analysis platform to conduct studies for identifying T2DM subtypes in patient records from hospitals.

Indexed as

ClassificationData-drivenDiabetesDiabetes subtypes

Identifiers

PMID37608329
PMCPMC10463725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.