Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608320›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2023

Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey.

Florence Nakaggwa, Derrick Kimuli, Kenneth Kasule, Justine Fay Katwesige, Denis Kintu, Rhobbinah Ssempebwa, Solome Sevume, Patrick Komakech, Norbert Mubiru, Baker Maggwa and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florence NakaggwaSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda. florence.nakaggwa@dlhcorp.com.
Derrick KimuliSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Kenneth KasuleSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Justine Fay KatwesigeSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Denis KintuOffice of Health and HIV, USAID/Uganda, US Mission Compound - South Wing, Plot 1577 Ggaba Road, P. O. Box 7856, Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
Rhobbinah SsempebwaOffice of Health and HIV, USAID/Uganda, US Mission Compound - South Wing, Plot 1577 Ggaba Road, P. O. Box 7856, Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
Solome SevumeOffice of Health and HIV, USAID/Uganda, US Mission Compound - South Wing, Plot 1577 Ggaba Road, P. O. Box 7856, Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick KomakechOffice of Health and HIV, USAID/Uganda, US Mission Compound - South Wing, Plot 1577 Ggaba Road, P. O. Box 7856, Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
Norbert MubiruOffice of Health and HIV, USAID/Uganda, US Mission Compound - South Wing, Plot 1577 Ggaba Road, P. O. Box 7856, Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
Baker MaggwaOffice of Family Planning and Reproductive Health, USAID, 05.4.1A, 500 D Street SW, 20547, Washington, DC, USA.
Maria Augusta CarrascoOffice of Family Planning and Reproductive Health, USAID, 05.4.1A, 500 D Street SW, 20547, Washington, DC, USA.
Norah NamuwengeSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca N NsubugaSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Barbara AmuronSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Daraus BukenyaSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Bonnie WanderaSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company / USAID SITES, Plot 2730 Church Road, Kironde Zone, P.O.Box 12761, Kampala, Uganda.
Associates Research · UGUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe initiation and use of family planning (FP) services within the first 12 months following childbirth, postpartum family planning (PPFP), promotes safe motherhood by reducing unintended pregnancies and ensuring appropriate pregnancy spacing. However, there is a paucity of information on PPFP uptake from community surveys. This study aimed to quantify the reported use of PPFP and identify predictors and barriers to PPFP uptake from a large community survey.

methodsWe analysed data collected from the 2021 Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) survey, a cross-sectional community and household survey that covered 68 districts in Uganda. The survey uses small sample sizes to designate health or administrative geographical areas which are assessed to determine whether they achieved the pre-determined target for defined indicators of interest. We abstracted and analysed data collected from mothers of children aged 12 months or younger on reproductive health and FP. PPFP use was defined as the reported use of modern FP by the mother or their partner. Associations were measured using Pearson's chi-square test at 5% significance. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for variables that were significantly associated with PPFP use to identify the predictors of PPFP.

resultsOverall, 8103 mothers of children aged less than 12 years were included in the analysis; the majority of mothers, 55.8% (4521/8103) were above 24 years while 11.7% (950/8103) were 19 years and under. 98% (7942/8103) of the mothers attended at least one antenatal care (ANC) visit and 86.3% (6997/8103) delivered at a health facility. Only 10% (814/8103) of mothers who participated in the survey reported PPFP use at the time of the survey. Reporting of PPFP use was 5 times higher among mothers of children aged 7-12 months (AOR 4.9; 95%CI 4.1-5.8), 50% higher among mothers with secondary education (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.3), 80% higher among breastfeeding mothers (AOR 1.8; 95%CI 1.3-2.4) and 30% lower among those that didn't receive a health worker visit within 3 months preceding the survey (AOR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-0.8). Among 4.6% (372/8103) who stated a reason for non-use of PPFP, the most cited reasons for not using were breastfeeding 43% (161/372), fear of side effects 26.9% (100/372), respondent/partner opposition 17.6% (48/372) and infrequent sex 12.1% (48/372).

conclusionThe analysis showed a low proportion of PPFP uptake among mothers of children under 12 years. Possible barriers included child age, education, a health worker visit, and side effects and perceived benefits of possibly improperly implementing lactation amenorrhea method. Integration of social, community and health services could provide a more holistic approach to improving PPFP uptake.

Indexed as

Family planningPostpartumUganda

Identifiers

PMID37608320
PMCPMC10463570
OpenAlexW4386084854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.