Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023
Comparison of different volumes spread of erector spinae block in postmastectomy pain syndrome management: a prospective randomized comparative study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05192278 (Comparison of Different Volumes Spread of Erector Spinae Block in Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Different Volumes Spread of Erector Spinae Block in Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Clinical Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Breast Surgeries: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Unilateral Erector Spine Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Management Among Adult Patients Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostmastectomy pain is chronic pain that occurs in females after breast surgeries. In this study, we estimated the vertebral levels reached by two different volumes (20 ml and 30 ml solutions) in the erector spinae block (ESB), as well as assess pain improvement and patient satisfaction in females with postmastectomy pain syndrome.
methodsFifty patients were assigned to two groups. The 20 ml group received ESB with 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%, 1 ml of 40 mg/ml of methylprednisolone, 2 ml of non-ionic contrast, and 7 ml of saline 0.9%. The 30 ml group received ESB with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%, 1 ml of 40 mg/ml of methylprednisolone, 2 ml of non-ionic contrast, and 12 ml of saline 0.9%.
resultsThe mean numbers of the blockade segments were 5.12 ± 0.726 and 6.36 ± 0.569 in the 20 ml and 30 ml groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The T1 to T6 blockade levels were achieved in six patients (24%) in the 20 ml group, versus 23 patients (92%) in the 30 ml group (P < 0.001). The numerical rating scale (NRS) improved in the 30 ml group during the follow-up period, compared to the 20 ml group. The T1 to T6 blockade levels showed better NRS (P < 0.001) and patient satisfaction (P = 0.011) than other blockade levels.
conclusionsThe injection of a 30 ml solution of 0.25% bupivacaine with methylprednisolone in erector spinae block (ESB) may result in better analgesia and higher patient satisfaction in individuals with postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) compared to a 20 ml solution.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05192278) on 14/1/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.