ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
iDESC: identifying differential expression in single-cell RNA sequencing data with multiple subjects.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential expression analysis in single-cell and spatial RNA-seq without model assumptions.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Aberrant cellular communities underlying disease heterogeneity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Differential expression analysis in single cell and spatial RNASeq without model assumptions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Simulating paired and longitudinal single-cell RNA sequencing data with rescueSim.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- DiSC: a statistical tool for fast differential expression analysis of individual-level single-cell RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Sex-specific single cell-level transcriptomic signatures of Rett syndrome disease progression.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Sex-specific single cell-level transcriptomic signatures of Rett syndrome disease progression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- eSVD-DE: cohort-wide differential expression in single-cell RNA-seq data using exponential-family embeddings.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- eSVD-DE: Cohort-wide differential expression in single-cell RNA-seq data using exponential-family embeddings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Correction: iDESC: identifying differential expression in single-cell RNA sequencing data with multiple subjects.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- stVAE deconvolves cell-type composition in large-scale cellular resolution spatial transcriptomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Consistent analysis of differentially expressed genes across 7 cell types in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has enabled assessment of transcriptome-wide changes at single-cell resolution. Due to the heterogeneity in environmental exposure and genetic background across subjects, subject effect contributes to the major source of variation in scRNA-seq data with multiple subjects, which severely confounds cell type specific differential expression (DE) analysis. Moreover, dropout events are prevalent in scRNA-seq data, leading to excessive number of zeroes in the data, which further aggravates the challenge in DE analysis.
resultsWe developed iDESC to detect cell type specific DE genes between two groups of subjects in scRNA-seq data. iDESC uses a zero-inflated negative binomial mixed model to consider both subject effect and dropouts. The prevalence of dropout events (dropout rate) was demonstrated to be dependent on gene expression level, which is modeled by pooling information across genes. Subject effect is modeled as a random effect in the log-mean of the negative binomial component. We evaluated and compared the performance of iDESC with eleven existing DE analysis methods. Using simulated data, we demonstrated that iDESC had well-controlled type I error and higher power compared to the existing methods. Applications of those methods with well-controlled type I error to three real scRNA-seq datasets from the same tissue and disease showed that the results of iDESC achieved the best consistency between datasets and the best disease relevance.
conclusionsiDESC was able to achieve more accurate and robust DE analysis results by separating subject effect from disease effect with consideration of dropouts to identify DE genes, suggesting the importance of considering subject effect and dropouts in the DE analysis of scRNA-seq data with multiple subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.