Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608207›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The contribution of maternal oral, vaginal, and gut microbiota to the developing offspring gut.

Amber L Russell, Zachary L McAdams, Erin Donovan, Nicole Seilhamer, Melissa Siegrist, Craig L Franklin, Aaron C Ericsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amber L RussellDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri Metagenomics Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Zachary L McAdamsDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri Metagenomics Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Erin DonovanUniversity of Missouri Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center (MU MMRRC), University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Nicole SeilhamerUniversity of Missouri Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center (MU MMRRC), University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Melissa SiegristUniversity of Missouri Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center (MU MMRRC), University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Craig L FranklinDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri Metagenomics Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Aaron C EricssonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri Metagenomics Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA. ericssona@missouri.edu.

Funding

The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Bret Daniel Ulery · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
The influence of complex gut microbiota on central nervous system development and adult cognition and behaviorR03OD028259 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ERICSSON, AARON · 2020 to 2021
$233k
NIH HHS R03 OD028259NIH HHS U42 OD010918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited understanding of how the microbiota colonizing various maternal tissues contribute to the development of the neonatal gut microbiota (GM). To determine the contribution of various maternal microbiotic sites to the offspring microbiota in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract (GIT) during early life, litters of mice were sacrificed at 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 21 days of age, and fecal and ileal samples were collected. Dams were euthanized alongside their pups, and oral, vaginal, ileal, and fecal samples were collected. This was done in parallel using mice with either a low-richness or high-richness microbiota to assess the consistency of findings across multiple microbial compositions. Samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The compositional similarity between pup and dam samples were used to determine the contribution of each maternal source to the composition of the neonate fecal and ileal samples at each timepoint. As expected, similarity between neonate and maternal feces increased significantly over time. During earlier time-points however, the offspring fecal and ileal microbiotas were closer in composition to the maternal oral microbiota than other maternal sites. Prominent taxa contributed by the maternal oral microbiota to the neonate GM were supplier-dependent and included Lactobacillus spp., Streptococcus spp., and a member of the Pasteurellaceae family. These findings align with the microbial taxa reported in infant microbiotas, highlighting the translatability of mouse models in this regard, as well as the dynamic nature of the GM during early life.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFecesFemaleMiceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37608207
PMCPMC10444849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.