Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608199›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2023

A semiempirical method optimized for modeling proteins.

James J P Stewart, Anna C Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prediction of enzyme inhibition (ICJournal of molecular modeling · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James J P StewartStewart Computational Chemistry, 15210 Paddington Circle, Colorado Springs, CO, 80921, USA. MrMOPAC@att.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-8695
Anna C StewartStewart Computational Chemistry, 15210 Paddington Circle, Colorado Springs, CO, 80921, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIn recent years, semiempirical methods such as PM6, PM6-D3H4, and PM7 have been increasingly used for modeling proteins, in particular enzymes. These methods were designed for more general use, and consequently were not optimized for studying proteins. Because of this, various specific errors have been found that could potentially cast doubt on the validity of these methods for modeling phenomena of biochemical interest such as enzyme catalytic mechanisms and protein-ligand interactions. To correct these and other errors, a new method specifically designed for use in organic and biochemical modeling has been developed.

methodsTwo alterations were made to the procedures used in developing the earlier PMx methods. A minor change was made to the theoretical framework, which affected only the non-quantum theory interatomic interaction function, while the major change involved changing the training set for optimizing parameters, moving the focus to systems of biochemical significance. This involved both the selection of reference data and the weighting factors, i.e., the relative importance that the various data were given. As a result of this change of focus, the accuracy in prediction of heats of formation, hydrogen bonding, and geometric quantities relating to non-covalent interactions in proteins was improved significantly.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureCatalysisHydrogen BondingMOPACparameterizationPM6-ORGproteinsreference datasemiempirical

Identifiers

PMID37608199
PMCPMC10444645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.