ArticleCommunications medicine2023
Assessing the impact of the 2018 Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident on childhood vaccination in China.
Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reporting profile of adverse events following DTaP-IPV/Hib pentavalent vaccine: A 13-year real-world surveillance data analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Real-world safety profile of live attenuated Japanese encephalitis vaccine before and after the vaccine administration law.PloS one · 2025Article
- Why did people refuse vaccination during the pandemic? Exploring the impacts of trust and vaccine risk perception on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of the 2018 Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident on childhood vaccination in China.Communications medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2018 Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident is an emergent public health event in China with reports of DTaP vaccines with compromised efficacy. This study aimed to estimate the impact of the vaccine incident on real-world vaccination behaviors in China.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in ten provinces in 2019. Vaccination records were collected from 5294 children aged 6-59 months, with information on 75,579 vaccine doses for seven National Immunization Program (NIP) vaccines and two non-NIP vaccines received from 2014 to 2019. Chi-square test, interrupted time series, and logistic regression were used to evaluate the impacts of vaccine incident on vaccination delay, measured as the proportion of delayed doses out of total doses in schedule.
resultsHere we show significant increases in doses delayed ≤ 3 months (19.12% to 22.51%, p = 0.000) and > 3 months (7.17% to 11.82%, p = 0.000) for DTaP vaccine after the incident. By scaling nationally, there will be extra 2.1 million doses delayed ≤ 3 months and 2.8 million doses delayed > 3 months in the year following this incident. More guardians choose expensive private-market substitutes containing DTaP elements over government-funded DTaP vaccines. Controlling for socio-demographic factors, doses scheduled after the incident have higher odds of delays for DTaP vaccine (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 3.08-3.96) and other NIP vaccines (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 2.55-2.99), but not for non-NIP vaccines.
conclusionsThe observed delays in the incident-involved DTaP vaccine immunization reflect the negative effects of the vaccine incident on vaccination behaviors under the NIP. However, its effects seem minimal for non-NIP vaccines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.