Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608093›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Rethinking extent of resection of contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumor: different survival impacts on adult-type diffuse gliomas in 2021 World Health Organization classification.

Yae Won Park, Sooyon Kim, Kyunghwa Han, Sung Soo Ahn, Ju Hyung Moon, Eui Hyun Kim, Jinna Kim, Seok-Gu Kang, Se Hoon Kim, Seung-Koo Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Contemporary surgical strategies for resection of intracranial gliomas.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yae Won ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Sooyon KimDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Kyunghwa HanDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Sung Soo AhnDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. sungsoo@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-5558
Ju Hyung MoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Eui Hyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Jinna KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Koo LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. changjh@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

Korea Basic Science Institute 2020R1A2C1003886Korea Basic Science Institute 2020R1I1A1A01071648Ministry of Health and Welfare HI21C1161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExtent of resection (EOR) of contrast-enhancing (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) tumors may have different impacts on survival according to types of adult-type diffuse gliomas in the molecular era. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of EOR of CE and NE tumors in glioma according to the 2021 World Health Organization classification.

methodsThis retrospective study included 1193 adult-type diffuse glioma patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2021 (183 oligodendroglioma, 211 isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH]-mutant astrocytoma, and 799 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients) from a single institution. Patients had complete information on IDH mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, and O

resultsAmong 1193 patients, 935 (78.4%) patients had CE tumors. In entire oligodendrogliomas, gross total resection (GTR) of NE tumor was not associated with survival (HR = 0.56, p = 0.223). In 86 (47.0%) oligodendroglioma patients with CE tumor, GTR of CE tumor was the only independent predictor of survival (HR = 0.16, p = 0.004) in multivariable analysis. GTR of CE and NE tumors was independently associated with better survival in IDH-mutant astrocytoma and IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (all ps < 0.05).

conclusionsGTR of both CE and NE tumors may significantly improve survival within IDH-mutant astrocytomas and IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. In oligodendrogliomas, the EOR of CE tumor may be crucial in survival; aggressive GTR of NE tumor may be unnecessary, whereas GTR of the CE tumor is recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Surgical strategies on contrast-enhancing (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) tumors should be reassessed considering the different survival outcomes after gross total resection depending on CE and NE tumors in the 2021 World Health Organization classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas. KEY POINTS: The survival impact of extent of resection of contrast-enhancing (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) tumors was evaluated in adult-type diffuse gliomas. Gross total resection of both CE and NE tumors may improve survival in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytomas and IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, while only gross total resection of the CE tumor improves survival in oligodendrogliomas. Surgical strategies should be reconsidered according to types in adult-type diffuse gliomas.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaOligodendrogliomaAdultHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationRetrospective StudiesWorld Health OrganizationIsocitrate DehydrogenaseExtent of resectionGliomaMagnetic resonance imagingMolecular diagnosticsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37608093
OpenAlexW4386056236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.