ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2023
Leveraging global binary masks for structure segmentation in medical images.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pigment Network Analysis in Melanoma and Nevi: Retrospective Study from Snippets to Full Dermoscopic Images.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models for medical image segmentation are highly influenced by intensity variations of input images and lack generalization due to primarily utilizing pixels' intensity information for inference. Acquiring sufficient training data is another challenge limiting models' applications. Here, we proposed to leverage the consistency of organs' anatomical position and shape information in medical images. We introduced a framework leveraging recurring anatomical patterns through global binary masks for organ segmentation. Two scenarios were studied: (1) global binary masks were the only input for the U-Net based model, forcing exclusively encoding organs' position and shape information for rough segmentation or localization. (2) Global binary masks were incorporated as an additional channel providing position/shape clues to mitigate training data scarcity. Two datasets of the brain and heart computed tomography (CT) images with their ground-truth were split into (26:10:10) and (12:3:5) for training, validation, and test respectively. The two scenarios were evaluated using full training split as well as reduced subsets of training data. In scenario (1), training exclusively on global binary masks led to Dice scores of 0.77 ± 0.06 and 0.85 ± 0.04 for the brain and heart structures respectively. Average Euclidian distance of 3.12 ± 1.43 mm and 2.5 ± 0.93 mm were obtained relative to the center of mass of the ground truth for the brain and heart structures respectively. The outcomes indicated encoding a surprising degree of position and shape information through global binary masks. In scenario (2), incorporating global binary masks led to significantly higher accuracy relative to the model trained on only CT images in small subsets of training data; the performance improved by 4.3%-125.3% and 1.3%-48.1% for 1-8 training cases of the brain and heart datasets respectively. The findings imply the advantages of utilizing global binary masks for building models that are robust to image intensity variations as well as an effective approach to boost performance when access to labeled training data is highly limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.