ArticleBrain and language2023
Longitudinal characterization of patients with progressive apraxia of speech without clearly predominant phonetic or prosodic speech features.
Article in Brain and language, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cause of death for patients who present with primary progressive apraxia of speech.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological and Neuroimaging Correlates of Disease Duration in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Dysphagia and Mortality Risk in Individuals With Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Word Count Matters: Features of Written Language Production in Progressive Apraxia of Speech with and without Agrammatism.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2025Article
- Progression of Motor Speech Function in Speakers With Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Automatic Speech Recognition in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- The yes-no reversal phenomenon in patients with primary progressive apraxia of speech.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Characterizing Speech Errors Across Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech Subtypes.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most recent studies of progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) have focused on patients with phonetic or prosodic predominant PAOS to understand the implications of the presenting clinical phenotype. Patients without a clearly predominating speech quality, or mixed AOS, have been excluded. Given the implications for disease progression, it is important to understand these patients early in the disease course to inform appropriate education and prognostication. The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of ten patients with initially mixed PAOS and how their clinical course evolves. Four patients were rated prosodic predominant later on (mild AOS at first visit); five were later designated phonetic (four with more than mild AOS at first visit); one was judged mixed at all visits. The study suggests patients without a clear predominance of speech featuresshould still be included in PAOS studies and thought of on the continuum of the disease spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.