Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37607214›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Laboratory evaluation of eleven rapid diagnostic tests for serological diagnosis of Chagas disease in Colombia.

Andrea Marchiol, Astrid Carolina Florez Sanchez, Andrés Caicedo, Maryi Segura, Jessica Bautista, Martha Stella Ayala Sotelo, Rafael Herazo, Colin Forsyth, Laura C Bohorquez

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stage-InformedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Screening strategies for Chagas Disease: evaluation of a field diagnostic algorithm in Santiago del EsteroRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Performance evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for Chagas disease in Jutiapa, Guatemala.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea MarchiolDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative-Latin America, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-1931
Astrid Carolina Florez SanchezDirección de Redes de Laboratorio, Insitituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés CaicedoDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative-Latin America, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maryi SeguraDepartamento de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jessica BautistaDepartamento de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Martha Stella Ayala SoteloDepartamento de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Rafael HerazoDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative-Latin America, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Colin ForsythDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative-Latin America, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laura C BohorquezFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Instituto Nacional de Salud · COFIND · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is a public health challenge in Colombia, where only an estimated 1.2% of people at risk have accessed diagnosis, while less than 0.5% of affected people have obtained treatment. The development of simplified diagnostic algorithms would enable progress in access to diagnosis; however, the current diagnostic algorithm relies on at least two laboratory-based tests that require qualified personnel, processing equipment, and infrastructure, which are still generally lacking at the primary care level. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for Chagas disease could simplify diagnosis, but their performance in the epidemiological context of Colombia is not well known. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analytical observational study of RDTs was performed to estimate the operational characteristics of 11 commercially available RDTs designed for in vitro detection of anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies. The study was performed under controlled laboratory conditions using human serum samples. PRINCIPAL

findingsEleven RDTs were assessed, ten using 585 serum samples and one using 551 serum samples. Employing the current national diagnostic algorithm as a reference standard for serological diagnosis of chronic infection, the sensitivity of the assessed RDTs ranged from 75.5% to 99.0% (95% CI 70.5-100), while specificity ranged from 70.9% to 100% (95% CI 65.3-100). Most tests (7/11, 63.6%) had sensitivity above 90%, and almost all (10/11, 90.9%) had specificity above 90%. Five RDTs had both sensitivity and specificity above 90%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The evaluation of these 11 commercially available RDTs under controlled laboratory conditions is a first step in the assessment of the diagnostic performance of RDTs in Colombia. As a next step, field studies will be conducted on available RDTs with sensitivity and specificity greater than 90% in this study, to evaluate performance in real world conditions, with the final goal to allow simplified diagnostic algorithms.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseRapid Diagnostic TestsAntibodiesColombiaHumansRetrospective StudiesAntibodies

Identifiers

PMID37607214
PMCPMC10473487
OpenAlexW4386065916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.