Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606924›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Frequency of Biopsy and Tumor Grade Before vs After Introduction of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

David Robinson, Rafid Abdulkareem, Delshad Nasrollah, Anders Ljung, Per Hintze, Sara Wallby, Henriettæ Ståhlbrandt, Thorun Frennvall, Johan Styrke, Pär Stattin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David RobinsonDepartment of Urology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Rafid AbdulkareemDepartment of Urology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Delshad NasrollahDepartment of Urology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Anders LjungDepartment of Radiology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Per HintzeDepartment of Radiology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Sara WallbyDepartment of Radiology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Henriettæ StåhlbrandtDepartment of Radiology, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Thorun FrennvallDepartment of Pathology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Johan StyrkeDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Pär StattinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Hans GarmoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before prostate biopsy has been associated with fewer biopsies, decreased detection of Gleason score 6 cancers, and increased detection of Gleason score 7 or higher cancers. Objective: To study whether MRI of the prostate before the decision to biopsy is associated with biopsy frequency and distribution of Gleason score in clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of men in Jönköping Region, Sweden. Men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measured between November 2011 and 2020 were monitored until January 31, 2021. Men with known prostate cancer were excluded. Data analysis was performed from July to December 2022. Exposures: Data on repeated PSA measures, prostate biopsies, and MRI prostate were extracted from health care records, and cancer characteristics were obtained from The National Prostate Cancer Register. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportions of men who underwent prostate biopsy and risk of Gleason score 6 or Gleason score 7 or higher cancer and negative biopsy before and after introduction of MRI were calculated. Results: In this cohort study of 23 802 men (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [13.6] years) who underwent PSA testing, when the use of MRI increased, fewer biopsies were performed (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97) and the odds of detecting Gleason score 6 cancer decreased (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.64), whereas the odds of detecting Gleason score 7 or higher cancer increased (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the introduction of MRI to clinical practice was associated with a decreased proportion of men who underwent a biopsy and decreased detection of Gleason score 6 cancer but increased detection of Gleason score 7 or higher cancer. These clinical data support the use of prostate MRI before biopsy in an effort to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37606924
PMCPMC10445184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.