ArticleJAMA network open2023
Frequency of Biopsy and Tumor Grade Before vs After Introduction of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Feasibility and clinical value of a prostate cancer screening model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen in a Chinese population].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Trial
- Recent Advances in Multimodal Assessment Scoring Systems for Prostate Cancer: An Integrated Pathological and Imaging Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of software vs. cognitive-based fusion-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Increasing and more consistent use of pre-biopsy MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: insights from a population-based study in the Netherlands.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Cohort Profile Update: The National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden and PCBase.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Evolution of Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy, and Focal Therapy.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prostate Cancer Detection in Switzerland.European urology open science · 2025Article
- A pictorial essay of PI-RADS pearls and pitfalls: toward less ambiguity and better practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Review
- The evolving landscape: magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance for prostate cancer management.Frontiers in urology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBeyond the2024
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before prostate biopsy has been associated with fewer biopsies, decreased detection of Gleason score 6 cancers, and increased detection of Gleason score 7 or higher cancers. Objective: To study whether MRI of the prostate before the decision to biopsy is associated with biopsy frequency and distribution of Gleason score in clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of men in Jönköping Region, Sweden. Men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measured between November 2011 and 2020 were monitored until January 31, 2021. Men with known prostate cancer were excluded. Data analysis was performed from July to December 2022. Exposures: Data on repeated PSA measures, prostate biopsies, and MRI prostate were extracted from health care records, and cancer characteristics were obtained from The National Prostate Cancer Register. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportions of men who underwent prostate biopsy and risk of Gleason score 6 or Gleason score 7 or higher cancer and negative biopsy before and after introduction of MRI were calculated. Results: In this cohort study of 23 802 men (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [13.6] years) who underwent PSA testing, when the use of MRI increased, fewer biopsies were performed (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97) and the odds of detecting Gleason score 6 cancer decreased (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.64), whereas the odds of detecting Gleason score 7 or higher cancer increased (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the introduction of MRI to clinical practice was associated with a decreased proportion of men who underwent a biopsy and decreased detection of Gleason score 6 cancer but increased detection of Gleason score 7 or higher cancer. These clinical data support the use of prostate MRI before biopsy in an effort to avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.