Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606856›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity is not associated with seroprevalence of neurotropic infections.

C Schmitt, E P Hoefsmit, T Fangmeier, N Kramer, C Kabakci, J Vera González, J M Versluis, A Compter, T Harrer, H Mijočević and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02977052 (Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Identify of the Optimal Neo-Adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02977052 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Identify of the Optimal Neo-Adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab (OpACIN-neo)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2016 to 2025Enrolled186ConditionsMalignant Melanoma Stage IIIArmsIpilimumab, Nivolumab, Surgery, Blood for PBMCs, Biopsies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

C Schmitt *Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
E P Hoefsmit *Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T FangmeierDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
N KramerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
C KabakciDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Vera GonzálezDepartment of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
J M VersluisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A CompterDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T HarrerDepartment of Internal Medicine 3, Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiency Section, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
H MijočevićMax Von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
S SchubertMax Von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
T HundsbergerDepartments of Neurology and Medical Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
A M MenziesMelanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
R A ScolyerMelanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
G V LongMelanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
L E FrenchDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
C U Blank *Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L M Heinzerling *Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Lucie.Heinzerling@med.uni-muenchen.de.
LMU Klinikum · DEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Sydney · AUInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) substantially improve outcome for patients with cancer. However, the majority of patients develops immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be persistent and significantly reduce quality of life. Neurological irAEs occur in 1-5% of patients and can induce severe, permanent sequelae or even be fatal. In order to improve the diagnosis and treatment of neurological irAEs and to better understand their pathogenesis, we assessed whether previous neurotropic infections are associated with neurological irAEs.

methodsNeurotropic infections that might predispose to ICI-induced neurological irAEs were analyzed in 61 melanoma patients from 3 countries, the Netherlands, Australia and Germany, including 24 patients with neurotoxicity and 37 control patients. In total, 14 viral, 6 bacterial, and 1 protozoal infections previously reported to trigger neurological pathologies were assessed using routine serology testing. The Dutch and Australian cohorts (NL) included pre-treatment plasma samples of patients treated with neoadjuvant ICI therapy (OpACIN-neo and PRADO trials; NCT02977052). In the Dutch/Australian cohort a total of 11 patients with neurological irAEs were compared to 27 control patients (patients without neurological irAEs). The German cohort (LMU) consisted of serum samples of 13 patients with neurological irAE and 10 control patients without any documented irAE under ICI therapy.

resultsThe association of neurological irAEs with 21 possible preceding infections was assessed by measuring specific antibodies against investigated agents. The seroprevalence of all the tested viral (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr-Virus, varicella-zoster virus, measles, rubella, influenza A and B, human herpes virus 6 and 7, herpes simplex virus 1 and 2, parvovirus B19, hepatitis A and E and human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 and 2), bacterial (Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Campylobacter jejuni, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Coxiella burnetti, Helicobacter pylori, Yersinia enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis) and protozoal (Toxoplasma gondii) infections was similar for patients who developed neurological irAEs as compared to control patients. Thus, the analysis provided no evidence for an association of described agents tested for seroprevalence with ICI induced neurotoxicity.

conclusionPrevious viral, bacterial and protozoal neurotropic infections appear not to be associated with the development of neurological irAEs in melanoma patients who underwent therapy with ICI across 3 countries. Further efforts are needed to unravel the factors underlying neurological irAEs in order to identify risk factors for these toxicities, especially with the increasing use of ICI in earlier stage disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalMelanomaAustraliaHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCheckpoint-inhibitorMelanomaSerologySide effect

Identifiers

PMID37606856
PMCPMC10576679
OpenAlexW4386046084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.