Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606852›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2023

Both Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Are Essential to Prevent Infection: a Prospective Study in a Working Vaccinated Population from Southern France.

Daisy Graça, Vesna Brglez, Jonathan Allouche, Kévin Zorzi, Céline Fernandez, Maxime Teisseyre, Marion Cremoni, Sylvia Benzaken, Christian Pradier, Barbara Seitz-Polski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HLA-E-restricted SARS-CoV-2 epitopes drive CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daisy Graça *Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Laboratoire d'immunologie, Nice, France.
Vesna Brglez *Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Laboratoire d'immunologie, Nice, France.
Jonathan AlloucheUniversité Côte d'Azur - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, UR2CA, Nice, France.
Kévin ZorziUniversité Côte d'Azur - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, UR2CA, Nice, France.
Céline FernandezCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Laboratoire d'immunologie, Nice, France.
Maxime TeisseyreUniversité Côte d'Azur - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, UR2CA, Nice, France.
Marion CremoniCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Laboratoire d'immunologie, Nice, France.
Sylvia BenzakenCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Laboratoire d'immunologie, Nice, France.
Christian PradierUniversité Côte d'Azur - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, UR2CA, Nice, France.
Barbara Seitz-PolskiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Laboratoire d'immunologie, Nice, France. seitz-polski.b@chu-nice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-5969
Université Côte d'Azur · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccines have significantly decreased the number of severe cases of the disease, but the virus circulation remains important, and questions about the need of new vaccination campaigns remain unanswered. The individual's protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection is most commonly measured by the level and the neutralizing capacity of antibodies produced against SARS-CoV-2. T cell response is a major contributor in viral infection, and several studies have shown that cellular T cell response is crucial in fighting off SARS-CoV-2 infection. Actually, no threshold of protective immune response against SARS-CoV2 infection has been identified. To better understand SARS-CoV-2-mediated immunity, we assessed both B cell (measuring anti-Spike IgG titer and neutralization capacity) and T cell (measuring IFNγ release assay after specific SARS-CoV2 stimulation) responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with or without virus encounter in a cohort of 367 working volunteers. Vaccinated individuals who had previously been infected had a stronger and more lasting immunity in comparison to vaccinated individuals naive to infection whose immunity started to decline 3 months after vaccination. IFNγ release ≥ 0.285 IU/mL and anti-Spike IgG antibodies ≥ 244 BAU/mL were associated with a sufficient immune response following vaccination preventing future infections. Individuals with comorbidities had a lower chance of reaching the protective thresholds of T cell and B cell responses as identified in multivariate analysis. A combined B cell and T cell analysis of immune responses to determine protective thresholds after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination will allow us to identify individuals in need of a booster vaccine dose, particularly in comorbid subjects.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesFranceHumansImmunity, CellularImmunoglobulin GProspective StudiesRNA, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GRNA, ViralB cell responseCOVID-19hybrid immunitySARS-Cov-2T cell responsevaccination

Identifiers

PMID37606852
PMCPMC10660913
OpenAlexW4386046603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.