Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606820›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023

Real-world evidence in the use of Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration (ArMD): a scoping review.

Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Priyanka Ghule, Rupesh Panchal, Theodoros Giannouchos, Catherine M Lockhart, Diana Brixner

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advances in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Treatment: Adjuvant Intralesional Bevacizumab's Impact, Potential and Insights from a Case Series Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ainhoa Gomez-LumbrerasDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 30S 2000E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Ainhoa.Gomez-Lumbreras@pharm.utah.edu.
Priyanka GhuleDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 30S 2000E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Rupesh PanchalDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 30S 2000E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Theodoros GiannouchosDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 30S 2000E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Catherine M LockhartBiologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Diana BrixnerDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 30S 2000E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
University of Utah · USAlabama Department of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePharmacological treatments for age-related macular degeneration (ArMD) include anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies. Bevacizumab is used off-label, as it has no indication for ArMD. This study aims to identify and describe literature on real-world evidence of bevacizumab (originator or biosimilars) use in ArMD.

methodsA scoping review was conducted in Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases. Studies published in English after September 2017, conducted in USA, including adults (≥ 18 years old) with ArMD who received treatment with bevacizumab for ArMD were included. The review was further limited to peer-reviewed observational studies that quantitatively analyze either clinical or patient-reported outcomes among patients treated with bevacizumab for ArMD.

resultsThe search strategy retrieved 543 studies. After title and abstract screening, a total of 142 studies were selected for full-text review leading to a total of 12 studies qualifying for data charting. All were retrospective studies. Five (41.6%) of the studies had less than 500 eyes included in the analysis, and the rest had over a thousand eyes. All except one study reported clinical outcomes (visual acuity was the main outcome in 8 (66.6%) studies). There were 3 (25%) studies reporting adverse events of bevacizumab intravitreal injections. None of the studies specified using biosimilars for bevacizumab and none mentioned patient-reported outcomes.

conclusionThe lack of studies aiming to study the patient-reported outcomes as well as the use of biosimilars of bevacizumab in ArMD makes this field a potential for future research. The different exposures and times to follow-up make it difficult to compare results among the selected studies.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsMacular DegenerationAdolescentAdultAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABevacizumabBiosimilar pharmaceuticalsDrug utilization reviewMacular degenerationObservational studies as topicPatient-reported outcome measuresSystematic reviewTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37606820
OpenAlexW4386046954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.