Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606814›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2024

Lymphatic trafficking of immune cells and insights for cancer metastasis.

David G Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cancer metastasis through the lymphatic versus blood vessels.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David G JacksonRadcliffe Department of Medicine, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK. David.jackson@imm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-9364

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cancers and in particular carcinomas metastasise via the lymphatics to draining lymph nodes from where they can potentially achieve systemic dissemination by invasion of high endothelial blood venules (HEVs) in the paracortex [1, 2]. Currently however, the mechanisms by which tumours invade and migrate within the lymphatics are incompletely understood, although it seems likely they exploit at least some of the normal physiological mechanisms used by immune cells to access lymphatic capillaries and traffic to draining lymph nodes in the course of immune surveillance, immune modulation and the resolution of inflammation [3, 4]. Typically these include directional guidance via chemotaxis, haptotaxis and durotaxis, adhesion to the vessel surface via receptors including integrins, and junctional re-modelling by MMPs (Matrix MetalloProteinases) and ADAMs (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinases) [5-7]. This short review focusses on a newly emerging mechanism for lymphatic entry that involves the large polysaccharide hyaluronan (HA) and its key lymphatic and immune cell receptors respectively LYVE-1 (Lymphatic Vessel Endothelial receptor) and CD44, and outlines recent work which indicates this axis may also be used by some tumours to aid nodal metastasis.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisLymphatic VesselsNeoplasmsAnimalsCell MovementHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic AcidVesicular Transport ProteinsHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic AcidLYVE1 protein, humanVesicular Transport ProteinsGlycocalyxHyaluronanImmune cellLymphaticLYVE-1Tumour metastasis

Identifiers

PMID37606814
PMCPMC11374813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.