Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606803›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2024

Emergency department crowding increases 10-day mortality for non-critical patients: a retrospective observational study.

Anna Eidstø, Jari Ylä-Mattila, Jalmari Tuominen, Heini Huhtala, Ari Palomäki, Teemu Koivistoinen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is a Prolonged Emergency Department Stay a Risk for Patient Safety?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna EidstøEmergency Department, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland. anna.eidsto@fimnet.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-1313
Jari Ylä-MattilaEmergency Department, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2421-3492
Jalmari TuominenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-9009
Heini HuhtalaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1372-430X
Ari PalomäkiFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9759-4332
Teemu KoivistoinenEmergency Department, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, 13530, Hämeenlinna, Finland.ORCID 0009-0008-1778-3212

Funding

Research Services of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District MJ0067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current evidence suggests that higher levels of crowding in the Emergency Department (ED) have a negative impact on patient outcomes, including mortality. However, only limited data are available about the association between crowding and mortality, especially for patients discharged from the ED. The primary objective of this study was to establish the association between ED crowding and overall 10-day mortality for non-critical patients. The secondary objective was to perform a subgroup analysis of mortality risk separately for both admitted and discharged patients. An observational single-centre retrospective study was conducted in the Tampere University Hospital ED from January 2018 to February 2020. The ED Occupancy Ratio (EDOR) was used to describe the level of crowding and it was calculated both at patient's arrival and at the maximum point during the stay in the ED. Age, gender, Emergency Medical Service transport, triage acuity, and shift were considered as confounding factors in the analyses. A total of 103,196 ED visits were included. The overall 10-day mortality rate was 1.0% (n = 1022). After controlling for confounding factors, the highest quartile of crowding was identified as an independent risk factor for 10-day mortality. The results were essentially similar whether using the EDOR at arrival (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61, p = 0.009) or the maximum EDOR (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.56, p = 0.020). A more precise, mortality-associated threshold of crowding was identified at EDOR 0.9. The subgroup analysis did not yield any statistically significant findings. The risk for 10-day mortality increased among non-critical ED patients treated during the highest EDOR quartile.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPatient DischargeCrowdingEmergency Service, HospitalHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesAdverse patient outcomeCrowdingEmergency DepartmentEmergency Department occupancy ratioMortality

Identifiers

PMID37606803
PMCPMC10827824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.