ArticleSpine deformity2024
Is there an anatomic basis for the different behavior of Lenke types 1AR and 1AL in idiopathic scoliosis? A study on facet joint tropism influence.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAIS type 1 Curves are sub-classified based on the tilt of L4 as 1AR and 1AL. These curves are different w.r.t their curve behavior, progression and level selection. Presently there is no known anatomic etiology for the different behavior. Facet tropism (FT) is defined as the asymmetry between the facet angle of the left and right facet joints. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between facet tropism in the lumbar segments and occurrence of type 1AR and 1AL curves in AIS patients.
methodsAIS patients with diagnosis of type 1 AR and 1AL right thoracic AIS curves who underwent posterior instrumented fusion were queried from a single institutions' database. Patients needed to have an MRI of their entire spine to be included. L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 Facet angles (FA, angle made by the facet line with the mid-sagittal line at respected vertebral level) were calculated. FT was classified as follows: ≤ 5° (minimal), 6- 10° (mild) and ≥ 11° (severe). 1AR and 1AL curves were compared for FA, FT and FT grade at each lumbar segmental levels.
resultsOne hundred nineteen patients were included (77 females, mean age-13.85 years, mean BMI- 21.63, 73 1AL and 46 1AR). The mean thoracic Cobb was 52.5 ± 9.8°, thoracic kyphosis was 28.12 ± 12° and lumbar lordosis was 53.48 ± 12.6°. L3-4 FA on the right side was more coronally oriented in 1AR curves compared to 1AL curves (37° vs. 31°, p = 0.04). On comparing FT at each level, 1AR curves had a higher FT at L3-4 (1.5° vs. - 2.3°, p = 0.01) and L4-5 levels (5.8° vs. - 0.28°, p < 0.001) compared to 1AL patients. Similarly, 1AR patients had significantly more patients with severe FT at L3-4 (34.8% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.02) and at L4-5 (17.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.01) compared to 1ALcurves.
conclusionL3-4 joints are more coronally oriented in 1AR curves compared to 1AL curves. 1AR patients displayed higher FT at L3-4 and L4-5 compared to 1AL patients. 1AR curves also reveal a higher percentage of severe FT at L3-4 and L4-5 levels. This may influence the curve behavior and progression in these two curve types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.