ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023
Evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the rectal cancers: comparison between modified reduced field-of-view single-shot echo-planar imaging with tilted two-dimensional radiofrequency excitation pulses and conventional full field-of-view readout-segmented echo-planar imaging.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to Integrate Surgery into the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Liver-Only Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer MRI from theory to practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Generative adversarial networks: multiparametric, multiregion super-resolution MRI in predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Delta-Radiomics Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Treated with Cetuximab Plus Avelumab (CAVE Trial).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- DWI of the rectum with deep learning reconstruction: comparison of PROPELLER, reduced FOV, and conventional DWI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Radiologists and treatment response assessment: conventional and functional radiological criteria for predicting therapeutic response in virus-related and non-virus-related cancers.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Review
- How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Colorectal cancer liver metastases: A radiologic point of view.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of the quality of prostate images from different diffusion-weighted imaging sequences: Single-shot echo-planar, reduced field-of-view, readout-segmented multi-shot.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2025Article
- Recent trends in AI applications for pelvic MRI: a comprehensive review.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the image quality qualitatively and quantitatively, as well as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of modified reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using spatially tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency pulses with tilted excitation plane (tilted r-DWI) based on single-shot echo planar imaging (SS-EPI) compared with full-size field-of-view DWI (f-DWI) using readout segmented (RS)-EPI in patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-two patients who underwent an MRI for further evaluation of rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. All MR images were analyzed to compare image quality, lesion conspicuity, and artifacts between f-DWI with RS-EPI and tilted r-DWI with SS-EPI. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and ADC values were also compared. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t test was performed to compare the qualitative and quantitative assessments.
resultsAll image quality scores, except aliasing artifacts, were significantly higher (p < 0.01 for all) in tilted r-DWI than f-DWI with RS-EPI. CNR in tilted r-DWI was significantly higher than in f-DWI with RS-EPI (p < 0.01), while SNR was not significantly different. Regarding the ADC values, no significant difference was observed between tilted r-DWI and f-DWI with RS-EPI (p = 0.27).
conclusionTilted r-DWI provides a better image quality with fewer artifacts and higher rectal lesion conspicuity than f-DWI with RS-EPI, indicating the feasibility of this MR sequence in evaluating rectal cancer in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.