Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606729›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Effect of congenital inner ear malformations (IEMs) on electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) responses in cochlear implant children.

Nithreen M Said, Lena S Telmesani, Laila M Telmesani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nithreen M SaidAudiovestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. nithreens@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-8704
Lena S TelmesaniOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0519-0344
Laila M TelmesaniOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7237-4923
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAAin Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study was designed to assess the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) responses in children with inner ear malformations compared to children with normal inner ear anatomy.

methodsThe study included 235 prelingual deaf children who were implanted in cochlear implant unit in King Fahad University hospital-Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisel University. Subjects were using either Cochlear Nucleus or Medel cochlear implant devices. We had 171 (64.5%) subjects with normal inner ear anatomy and 94 (35.5%) subjects with inner ear malformations (IEMs) and they were classified into 6 groups according to inner ear anatomy. Fourteen subjects (14.9%) subjects had enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), 30 (32%) subjects had Mondini deformity, 25 (26.6%) subjects had incomplete partition type two (IPII), 9 (9.6%) subjects had incomplete partition type one (IPI) and 16 (17%) subjects had hypoplastic cochlea type III or IV. Intraoperative electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) responses were analyzed and compared in all subjects. RESULTS AND

conclusionsMeasurable ECAP responses can be elicited in patients with IEMs in most of the channels. Severe malformations can affect the prevalence of measuring ECAP and getting identifiable waveform morphology. Additionally, increased thresholds and lower slope of AGF was observed in IEMs specially in more severe malformations (e.g. IPI). IPI patients with better word recognition scores tended to show more identifiable ECAP measurements. This could suggest the presence of some correlation between ECAP responses and patients' performance after cochlear implantation.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsEar, InnerHearing Loss, SensorineuralAction PotentialsChildElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumansAuditory nerve responsesCochlear implantationElectric compound action potentials (ECAP)Inner ear malformations

Identifiers

PMID37606729
OpenAlexW4386045817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.