Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606724›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Risk factors for kyphosis recurrence after implant removal in percutaneous osteosynthesis for post-traumatic thoracolumbar fracture.

G Lainé, I Mezjan, D Masson, T Civit, N Mansouri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Defining threshold for sagittal correction in lumbar fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G LainéDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polyclinique Pau Pyrénées, 8 Boulevard Hauterive, 64000, Pau, France. gaetan.laine@neurochirurgie.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4825-8030
I MezjanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Central, Centre Hospitalier Région Universitaire de Nancy, 29 Avenue Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54000, Nancy, France.
D MassonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Central, Centre Hospitalier Région Universitaire de Nancy, 29 Avenue Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54000, Nancy, France.
T CivitDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Central, Centre Hospitalier Région Universitaire de Nancy, 29 Avenue Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54000, Nancy, France.
N MansouriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Central, Centre Hospitalier Région Universitaire de Nancy, 29 Avenue Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54000, Nancy, France.
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier De Pau · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeShort-segment minimally invasive percutaneous spinal osteosynthesis has now become one of the treatments of choice to treat thoracolumbar fractures. The question of implant removal once the fracture has healed is still a matter of debate since this procedure can be associated with loss of sagittal correction. Therefore, we analyzed risk factors for kyphosis recurrence after spinal implants removal in patients treated with short-segment minimally invasive percutaneous spinal instrumentation for a thoracolumbar fracture.

methodsA total of 32 patients who underwent implant removal in percutaneous osteosynthesis for post-traumatic thoracolumbar fracture were enrolled in our study. Patient's medical record, operative report and imaging examinations carried out at the trauma and during the follow-up were analyzed.

resultsEvery patient experienced fracture union. Vertebral kyphotic angle (VKA) and Cobb angle (CA) improved significantly after stabilization surgery. VKA, CA, upper disk kyphotic angle (UDKA) and lower disk kyphotic angle (LDKA) significantly gradually decreased during follow-up. Traumatic disk injury (p: 0.001), younger age (p: 0.01), canal compromise (p: 0.04) and importance of surgical correction (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with kyphosis recurrence after implant removal. Anterior body augmentation did not affect loss of correction (CA and VKA) during the follow-up period (p: 0.57).

conclusionDespite correction of the fracture after stabilization, we observed a progressive loss of correction over time appearing even before implant removal. Particular attention should be paid to post-traumatic disk damage or canal invasion, to young patients and to surgical overcorrection of the traumatic kyphosis.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneKyphosisSpinal FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeImplant removalKyphosisSpinal fracturesSpinal osteosynthesisTraumatology

Identifiers

PMID37606724
OpenAlexW4386045908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.