Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606711›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

"Chemobrain" in childhood cancer survivors-the impact on social, academic, and daily living skills: a qualitative systematic review.

Ines Semendric, Danielle Pollock, Olivia J Haller, Rebecca P George, Lyndsey E Collins-Praino, Alexandra L Whittaker

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ines SemendricSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. ines.semendric@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7099-929X
Danielle PollockHealth Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6604-0609
Olivia J HallerSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-7818
Rebecca P GeorgeSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3625-3598
Lyndsey E Collins-PrainoSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4380-7600
Alexandra L WhittakerSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-8296
The University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine children's experiences of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment--colloquially "chemobrain"--and the impact on children's social, academic, and daily living skills via a qualitative systematic review. Experiencing chemotherapy as a child, when the brain is still developing, may cause lifelong detriment to survivors' lives. There is a significant gap in understanding their lived experience, including the self-identified barriers that children face following treatment. Such a gap can only be fully bridged by listening to the child's own voice and/or parent proxy report through an exploration of the qualitative research literature.

methodsA search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria were qualitative studies with a focus on children (0-18 years) during and/or following chemotherapy treatment and explored children's experiences of chemobrain.

resultsTwo synthesized findings were identified from six studies. (1) Chemobrain has an academic and psychosocial impact, which may not be understood by education providers. (2) Children and their parents have concerns about their reintegration and adaptation to school, social lives, and their future selves as independent members of society. Children's experiences primarily related to changes in their academic and social functioning.

conclusionThis review highlights two important considerations: (1) the lived experiences of pediatric childhood cancer survivors guiding where future interventions should be targeted, and (2) a need to perform more qualitative research studies in this area, as well as to improve the quality of reporting among the existing literature, given that this is a current gap in the field.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsChemotherapy-Related Cognitive ImpairmentCognitive DysfunctionNeoplasmsChildHumansSurvivorsAcademic performanceCancer and oncologyChemobrainChildhood cancerCognitive impairmentSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID37606711
PMCPMC10444646
OpenAlexW4386046589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.