ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Effects of a comprehensive brain computed tomography deep learning model on radiologist detection accuracy.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How Does Medical Artificial Intelligence Revolutionize Physician Productivity?Yonsei medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- AI-Assisted Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Localization on Cervical Non-contrast CT: A Multicenter Validation and Two-Reader Pilot Study of a Standalone Executable nnU-Net Software.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Large Language Models Evaluation of Medical Licensing Examination Using GPT-4.0, ERNIE Bot 4.0, and GPT-4o.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lightweight deep learning for medical imaging using MobileNetV2-based brain pathology classification with Grad-CAM interpretability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical-imaging fusion model for risk assessment of clinically significant prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in AI-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using MRI: a comprehensive survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted reader evaluation in acute CT head interpretation (AI-REACT): a multireader multicase study.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Standalone AI Versus AI-Assisted Radiologists in Emergency ICH Detection: A Prospective, Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Reducing the workload of medical diagnosis through artificial intelligence: A narrative review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of human and artificial intelligence collaboration on workload reduction in medical image interpretation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Iatrogenic vascular complications of non-vascular percutaneous abdominal procedures.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Identification of Mass Effect and Vasogenic Edema on CT of the Head.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Impact of a deep learning-based brain CT interpretation algorithm on clinical decision-making for intracranial hemorrhage in the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Identification of Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtypes on Computed Tomography of the Head.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Ready for testing artificial intelligence in radiology clinical practice: We would do well to be in the front line leveraging their strengths but also highlighting today weaknesses.European radiology · 2024Article
- Adoption, orchestration, and deployment of artificial intelligence within the National Health Service-facilitators and barriers: an expert roundtable discussion.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNon-contrast computed tomography of the brain (NCCTB) is commonly used to detect intracranial pathology but is subject to interpretation errors. Machine learning can augment clinical decision-making and improve NCCTB scan interpretation. This retrospective detection accuracy study assessed the performance of radiologists assisted by a deep learning model and compared the standalone performance of the model with that of unassisted radiologists.
methodsA deep learning model was trained on 212,484 NCCTB scans drawn from a private radiology group in Australia. Scans from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings were included. Scan inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and series slice thickness ≤ 1.5 mm. Thirty-two radiologists reviewed 2848 scans with and without the assistance of the deep learning system and rated their confidence in the presence of each finding using a 7-point scale. Differences in AUC and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) were calculated using a ground-truth gold standard.
resultsThe model demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 across 144 NCCTB findings and significantly improved radiologist interpretation performance. Assisted and unassisted radiologists demonstrated an average AUC of 0.79 and 0.73 across 22 grouped parent findings and 0.72 and 0.68 across 189 child findings, respectively. When assisted by the model, radiologist AUC was significantly improved for 91 findings (158 findings were non-inferior), and reading time was significantly reduced.
conclusionsThe assistance of a comprehensive deep learning model significantly improved radiologist detection accuracy across a wide range of clinical findings and demonstrated the potential to improve NCCTB interpretation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study evaluated a comprehensive CT brain deep learning model, which performed strongly, improved the performance of radiologists, and reduced interpretation time. The model may reduce errors, improve efficiency, facilitate triage, and better enable the delivery of timely patient care. KEY POINTS: • This study demonstrated that the use of a comprehensive deep learning system assisted radiologists in the detection of a wide range of abnormalities on non-contrast brain computed tomography scans. • The deep learning model demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 across 144 findings and significantly improved radiologist interpretation performance. • The assistance of the comprehensive deep learning model significantly reduced the time required for radiologists to interpret computed tomography scans of the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.