Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606663›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Effects of a comprehensive brain computed tomography deep learning model on radiologist detection accuracy.

Quinlan D Buchlak, Cyril H M Tang, Jarrel C Y Seah, Andrew Johnson, Xavier Holt, Georgina M Bottrell, Jeffrey B Wardman, Gihan Samarasinghe, Leonardo Dos Santos Pinheiro, Hongze Xia and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Quinlan D BuchlakAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia. quinlan.buchlak1@my.nd.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-3223
Cyril H M TangAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jarrel C Y SeahAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew JohnsonAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Xavier HoltAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Georgina M BottrellAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jeffrey B WardmanAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gihan SamarasingheAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Leonardo Dos Santos PinheiroAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hongze XiaAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hassan K AhmadAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hung PhamAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jason I ChiangAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nalan EktasAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael R MilneAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christopher H Y ChiuAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ben HacheyAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melissa K RyanAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Benjamin P JohnstonAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nazanin EsmailiSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christine BennettSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tony GoldschlagerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jonathan HallAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Duc Tan VoDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Lauren Oakden-RaynerAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jean-Christophe LevequeCenter for Neurosciences and Spine, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Farrokh FarrokhiCenter for Neurosciences and Spine, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Richard G AbramsonAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Catherine M JonesAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Simon EdelsteinAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter BrotchieAnnalise.ai, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNon-contrast computed tomography of the brain (NCCTB) is commonly used to detect intracranial pathology but is subject to interpretation errors. Machine learning can augment clinical decision-making and improve NCCTB scan interpretation. This retrospective detection accuracy study assessed the performance of radiologists assisted by a deep learning model and compared the standalone performance of the model with that of unassisted radiologists.

methodsA deep learning model was trained on 212,484 NCCTB scans drawn from a private radiology group in Australia. Scans from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings were included. Scan inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and series slice thickness ≤ 1.5 mm. Thirty-two radiologists reviewed 2848 scans with and without the assistance of the deep learning system and rated their confidence in the presence of each finding using a 7-point scale. Differences in AUC and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) were calculated using a ground-truth gold standard.

resultsThe model demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 across 144 NCCTB findings and significantly improved radiologist interpretation performance. Assisted and unassisted radiologists demonstrated an average AUC of 0.79 and 0.73 across 22 grouped parent findings and 0.72 and 0.68 across 189 child findings, respectively. When assisted by the model, radiologist AUC was significantly improved for 91 findings (158 findings were non-inferior), and reading time was significantly reduced.

conclusionsThe assistance of a comprehensive deep learning model significantly improved radiologist detection accuracy across a wide range of clinical findings and demonstrated the potential to improve NCCTB interpretation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study evaluated a comprehensive CT brain deep learning model, which performed strongly, improved the performance of radiologists, and reduced interpretation time. The model may reduce errors, improve efficiency, facilitate triage, and better enable the delivery of timely patient care. KEY POINTS: • This study demonstrated that the use of a comprehensive deep learning system assisted radiologists in the detection of a wide range of abnormalities on non-contrast brain computed tomography scans. • The deep learning model demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 across 144 findings and significantly improved radiologist interpretation performance. • The assistance of the comprehensive deep learning model significantly reduced the time required for radiologists to interpret computed tomography scans of the brain.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdolescentAdultHumansRadiographyRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceBrainMachine learningSupervised machine learningTomography, x-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID37606663
PMCPMC10853361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.