ArticleEuropean radiology2024
A new method to estimate the histological stage of primary biliary cholangitis.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the diagnostic efficacy of the periportal hypoechoic band (PHB) in the histological stage of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
methodsWe prospectively included 77 cases of PBC pathologically or clinically confirmed, and high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) measurements of the PHB were performed in all included patients. Ludwig staging system of histopathology was used as the gold standard.
resultsThe width of the PHB was positively correlated with histological staging (r = 0.844, p < 0.001). By area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the best cutoff value for PHB for advanced stage (≥ stage 3) was 2.4 mm (AUROC: 0.934; 95%CI: 0.841-0.981) and 0.93 for sensitivity, and 0.91 for specificity, the concordance rates of PHB vs. liver biopsy was 90.3%. The correct rate for early-stage PBC was 87.9% and for the progressive stage was 93.1%. After multi-factor regression analysis, the PHB (OR = 1.331, CI = 1.105-1.603, p = 0.003) and total bilirubin (OR = 1.156, CI = 1.041-1.285, p = 0.007) were independent influencing factors for progressive PBC.
conclusionsMeasurement of the PHB to assess advanced PBC is a simple and effective method. This method may complement current methods for the histological staging assessment of patients with PBC. REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR 2000032053, 2020/04/19. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The measurement of periportal hypoechoic band (PHB) provides a simple and easy assessment of the degree of disease progression in patients with PBC and provides an important clinical reference in predicting the histological staging of PBC from an ultrasound perspective. KEY POINTS: • The PHB is correlated with histological staging in the patient with PBC. • The area under the ROC curves of PHB for detecting advanced stage (≥ stage 3) were 0.934 and 0.93 for sensitivity, and 0.91 for specificity, the concordance rates of PHB vs. liver biopsy was 90.3%. The application of PHB can better assess the advanced PBC. • Measurement of the PHB to assess advanced PBC is a simple and effective method that can significantly reduce the need for liver biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.