Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606461›Full record

ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2023

Knowledge of Diabetic Retinopathy among Primary Care Nurses Performing Fundus Photography and Agreement with Ophthalmologists on Screening.

Domingo Ángel Fernández-Gutiérrez, Janet Núñez-Marrero, Carlos Enrique Martínez-Alberto, Martín Rodríguez-Álvaro, Retisalud-Tenerife Primary Healthcare Research Group, Alfonso Miguel García-Hernández, Pedro Ruymán Brito-Brito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Use Of Fundus Photography In The Emergency Room-A Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Domingo Ángel Fernández-GutiérrezNursing Department, Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, University of La Laguna, 38200 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Janet Núñez-MarreroPrimary Care Management Board of Tenerife, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38003 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Carlos Enrique Martínez-AlbertoNuestra Señora de Candelaria School of Nursing, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Martín Rodríguez-ÁlvaroHealth Services Management Board of La Palma, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38713 Breña Alta, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-0912
Retisalud-Tenerife Primary Healthcare Research Group
Alfonso Miguel García-HernándezNursing Department, Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, University of La Laguna, 38200 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-8735
Pedro Ruymán Brito-BritoNursing Department, Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, University of La Laguna, 38200 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8048-9701
Universidad de La Laguna · ESHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria · ES

Funding

Colegio Oficial de Enfermeros de Santa Cruz de Tenerife ENF-19/06Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias, Servicio Canario de la Salud ENF-19/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), with macular oedema being one of the leading causes of avoidable blindness among individuals with DM worldwide. Fundus screening is the only method for early detection and treatment. High-quality training programmes for professionals performing primary care screening are essential to produce high-quality images that facilitate accurate lesion identification. This is a two-phase observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. The first phase analysed DR knowledge in a sample of nurses. The second phase explored agreement on DR screening between referral ophthalmologists in image assessment (gold standard) and a small group of nurses involved in the previous phase. In phase 1, the agreement rate for screening results was 90%. In phase 2, the overall raw agreement on the screening of fundus photography results between nurses and ophthalmologists was 75% (Cohen's kappa = 0.477;

Indexed as

attitudesdiabetic retinopathyearly diagnosishealth knowledgenursingpracticeprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID37606461
PMCPMC10443370
OpenAlexW4385757398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.