Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37606360›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Diagnosis and management of dogs with degenerative myelopathy: A survey of neurologists and rehabilitation professionals.

Teryn V Bouché, Joan R Coates, Sarah A Moore, Dominik Faissler, Mark Rishniw, Natasha J Olby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Common Neurologic Diseases in Geriatric Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  12. HomozygousGenes · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Teryn V BouchéDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Joan R CoatesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Sarah A MooreDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4311-6199
Dominik FaisslerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark RishniwDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0477-1780
Natasha J OlbyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-3484
North Carolina State University · USCornell University · USMissouri College · USThe Ohio State University · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntemortem diagnosis of degenerative myelopathy (DM) in dogs is presumptive and there are no accepted guidelines for the management of this condition. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesDescribe current practices of neurology clinicians and physical rehabilitation professionals in the diagnosis and management of DM. ANIMALS: None.

methodsOnline surveys examining diagnosis and management of DM were constructed and distributed via neurology and rehabilitation listservs.

resultsOne hundred ninety neurology and 79 rehabilitation professionals from 20 countries participated. Most neurology (142/189) and rehabilitation (23/39) respondents required genetic testing for the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mutation and 82/189 neurologists also required spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for presumptive DM diagnosis. Most neurology respondents recommended exercise (187/190) and physical rehabilitation (184/190). Over 50% (102/190) of neurology respondents perform rechecks on dogs diagnosed with DM. Rehabilitation respondents reported preservation or improvement of strength (78/79) and coordination (77/79) as therapeutic goals. At-home exercises (75/79), underwater treadmill (64/79), gait training (55/79), and strength building exercises (65/79) were used to maintain strength (58/79), coordination (56/79), muscle mass (56/79), and improve overall wellbeing (54/79). Neurology respondents reported that owners elect euthanasia when dogs become nonambulatory paraparetic whereas rehabilitation respondents report euthanasia when paraplegia and incontinence develop. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The majority of dogs diagnosed with DM have not undergone advanced imaging, the combination of history, neurological findings, and genetic testing is heavily relied upon. Whereas the diagnosis of DM is frequently made by veterinary neurologists, continued care is often performed by rehabilitation professionals or primary veterinarians.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDog DiseasesSpinal Cord DiseasesAnimalsDogsHumansMutationNeurologistsSuperoxide Dismutase-1Superoxide Dismutase-1amyotrophic lateral sclerosisdegenerativerehabilitationSOD1spinal cord

Identifiers

PMID37606360
PMCPMC10472985
OpenAlexW4386046666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.