Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605975›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Screening for depressive illness in adult populations.

Anne M Doherty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne M DohertyDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland; and Department of Liaison Psychiatry, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-5361
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a major cause of disability worldwide. Screening in at-risk populations is important in identifying those at most need of treatment. Pengpid et al report on high rates of incident and persistent symptoms of depression identified in an epidemiological study in a Thai population and their association with physical comorbidities. However, there are limitations to screening, due to both resource implications and the risk of diagnostic overshadowing. Although screening is useful in providing an overview of the prevalence of depressive symptoms from an epidemiological perspective, there may be justified concerns in translating this approach to clinical settings. This is especially true where the resources to provide further comprehensive assessment and treatment may be inadequate. Clinically there is a need to consider a more complete approach to screening that utilises screening tools embedded in a wider diagnostic approach which allows the detection and management of other confounding conditions.

Indexed as

comorbidityDepressive episodeepidemiologyprimary carerating scales

Identifiers

PMID37605975
PMCPMC10486234
OpenAlexW4386046797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.