Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605759›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023

A PCR-Reverse Dot Blot Hybridization Based Microfluidics Detection System for the Rapid Identification of 13 Fungal Pathogens Directly After Blood Cultures Over a Period of Time.

Chunhui Lin, Hao Tang, Xinyi Hu, Ge Li, Tong Jiang, Wensu Yang, Zhaoxin Xia, Yi Zhu, Huaming Xu, Jing Zhou and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunhui Lin *Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Hao Tang *Clinical Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Xinyi HuClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Ge LiClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Tong JiangClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Wensu YangClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoxin XiaClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Yi ZhuClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6985-095X
Huaming XuClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Jing ZhouClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Jilu ShenClinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0654-1556
Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is time-consuming to identify fungal pathogens from positive blood cultures using the standard culture-based method. And delayed diagnosis of bloodstream infection leads to significantly increased mortality. Methods: We developed a PCR-reverse dot blot hybridization combined with microfluidic chip techniques to rapidly identify 13 fungal pathogens within 3-4 h using the sample of blood cultured over a period of time. Results: We performed clinical validation using 43 blood culture-positive samples with a sensitivity of 96.7%, a specificity of 100%, and a concordance rate of 97.7%. Samples with different culture durations were evaluated using our approach, showing a detection rate of 85.2% at 16 h and 96.3% at 24 h; the platform could reach a detection limit of 10 Discussion: The detection rate of the platform is much higher than the positive rates of concurrent blood cultures. This method bears substantial clinical application potential as it incorporates the microfluidic platform with low reagent consumption, automation, and low cost (about 10 dollars).

Indexed as

bloodstream infectionCandida aurisfungemiamicrofluidicsPCR-reverse dot blot hybridization

Identifiers

PMID37605759
PMCPMC10440108
OpenAlexW4385879681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.