Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605749›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Is shape in the eye of the beholder? Assessing landmarking error in geometric morphometric analyses on live fish.

Paolo Moccetti, Jessica R Rodger, Jonathan D Bolland, Phoebe Kaiser-Wilks, Rowan Smith, Andy D Nunn, Colin E Adams, Jen A Bright, Hannele M Honkanen, Angus J Lothian and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paolo MoccettiEvolutionary and Ecological Genomics Group, School of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Jessica R RodgerAtlantic Salmon Trust Fellow, Scottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jonathan D BollandHull International Fisheries Institute, School of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Phoebe Kaiser-WilksScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rowan SmithScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andy D NunnHull International Fisheries Institute, School of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Colin E AdamsScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jen A BrightSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Hannele M HonkanenScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Angus J LothianAtlantic Salmon Trust Fellow, Scottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Matthew NewtonScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Domino A JoyceEvolutionary and Ecological Genomics Group, School of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geometric morphometrics is widely used to quantify morphological variation between biological specimens, but the fundamental influence of operator bias on data reproducibility is rarely considered, particularly in studies using photographs of live animals taken under field conditions. We examined this using four independent operators that applied an identical landmarking scheme to replicate photographs of 291 live Atlantic salmon (

Indexed as

Information DisseminationSalmo salarAnimalsReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignRiversAtlantic salmonBiasLandmarksMeasurement errorMorphometricsOpen scienceReplication crisisReproducibilitySalmonidsSalmo salar

Identifiers

PMID37605749
PMCPMC10440062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.