ArticleCureus2023
Intrathecal Nicardipine for Severe Intractable Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Novel Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment-Related Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy of autologous stem cell therapy in femoral head avascular necrosis: a comparative study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a poorly understood but increasingly recognized entity, likely multifactorial in nature and characterized by diffuse cerebral vasospasm that presents as sudden, intense, and fluctuating headaches. Due to insufficient evidence, there is currently no consensus on RCVS treatment guidelines. However, nicardipine, an L-type calcium channel blocker, may prove effective in RCVS treatment because of its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We report the concomitant use of intrathecal (IT) nicardipine and continuous intraarterial (IA) nicardipine infusion via microcatheter placed in the intracranial circulation for the treatment of a 58-year-old female with severe refractory RCVS. On presentation, this patient was noted to have a non-traumatic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to RCVS. Initially managed with oral verapamil, she later developed refractory symptomatic vasoconstriction requiring multiple angiograms for spasmolysis via balloon angioplasty and IA nicardipine. Due to the refractory nature of her spasm despite the IA therapy, we decided to attempt intrathecal nicardipine, starting at 4 mg q12 h via an external ventricular drain. This dose was escalated to 4 mg q6 h. The patient stabilized for 24 h but again decompensated, requiring continuous IA spasmolysis via a microcatheter placed in the left middle cerebral artery and left for continuous IA nicardipine infusion (5 mg/h). The patient showed slow incremental improvement clinically and a decrease in vasospasms on imaging, ultimately suffering minimal stroke burden. This patient's hospital course demonstrates that nicardipine, administered intrathecally or intraarterially, could be beneficial in select patients with refractory RCVS as a means of minimizing repeat angiography/angioplasty. Further studies are needed to better define a treatment paradigm for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.