Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605429›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2024

The association between care integration and care quality.

Micah B Aaron, Michaela Kerrissey, Zhanna Novikov, Maike V Tietschert, Adam Scherling, Hassina Bahadurzada, Russell S Phillips, Anna D Sinaiko, Sara J Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Micah B AaronDepartment of Health Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-0446
Michaela KerrisseyDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhanna NovikovDepartment of Management, Policy & Community Health, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
Maike V TietschertDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adam ScherlingRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Hassina BahadurzadaHarvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Russell S PhillipsCenter for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anna D SinaikoDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-1947
Sara J SingerStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

Understanding Health Care Delivery Systems PCOR Adoption and System PerformanceU19HS024067 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI DAMBERG, CHERYL · 2015 to 2019
$17.4M
AHRQ HHS 1U19HS024067-01AHRQ HHS U19 HS024067Israel Science Foundation 113/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aims to analyze the relationship between care integration and care quality, and to examine if the relationship varies by patient risk. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingThe key independent variables used validated measures derived from a provider survey of functional (i.e., administrative and clinical systems) and social (i.e., patient integration, professional cooperation, professional coordination) integration. Survey responses represented data from a stratified sample of 59 practice sites from 17 health systems. Dependent variables included three quality measures constructed from patient-level Medicare data: colorectal cancer screening among patients at risk, patient-level 30-day readmission, and a practice-level Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) composite measure of publicly reported, individual measures of ambulatory clinical quality performance. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodWe obtained quality- and beneficiary-level covariate data for the 41,966 Medicare beneficiaries served by the 59 practices in our survey sample. STUDY

designWe estimated hierarchical linear models to examine the association between care integration and care quality and the moderating effect of patients' clinical risk score. We graphically visualized the moderating effects at ±1 standard deviation of our z-standardized independent and moderating variables and performed simple slope tests. PRINCIPAL

findingsOur analyses uncovered a strong positive relationship between social integration, specifically patient integration, and the quality of care a patient receives (e.g., a 1-point increase in a practice's patient integration was associated with 0.31-point higher HEDIS composite score, p < 0.01). Further, we documented positive and significant associations between aspects of social and functional integration on quality of care based on patient risk.

conclusionsThe findings suggest social integration matters for improving the quality of care and that the relationship of integration to quality is not uniform for all patients. Policymakers and practitioners considering structural integrations of health systems should direct attention beyond structure to consider the potential for social integration to impact outcomes and how that might be achieved.

Indexed as

MedicareQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMalePatient ReadmissionUnited Statescare integrationintegrated carepatient riskqualitysocial integrationstructural integration

Identifiers

PMID37605429
PMCPMC11622280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.