ArticleBMC medical education2023
Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to evaluate current preceptorship provision across AHP professions in the Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent (SSOT) region of England to improve consistency, share and optimise best practice.
backgroundPreceptorship, defined as a period of structured transition from newly qualified to an independent practitioner, is thought to improve recruitment and retention of staff and ultimately improve patient care. During the COVID pandemic, SSOT recognised the potential for graduates to lack confidence having had reduced clinical exposure as pre-registration students, and so a likely increased need to support newly qualified staff, and to evaluate existing AHP preceptorship provision.
methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed methods design, utilising a cross sectional survey questionnaire and two subsequent focus groups, explored existing AHP preceptorship in SSOT in 2021. Following ethical approval respondents were recruited via professional networks who completed an online survey questionnaire. Two subsequent focus groups enabled an in-depth exploration of survey results. Descriptive statistics summarised survey data and thematic analysis was used to describe focus group findings.
resultsSSOT AHPs (n = 217; 26% preceptees; 47% preceptors) participated in the survey questionnaire and 17 AHPs in the focus groups. 57% of preceptees rated existing preceptorship programmes to be "somewhat, or not effective". Preceptors reported feeling unprepared for their role. Both preceptees and preceptors reported that, post pandemic, most existing programs required revisions to be fit for purpose. Ten pragmatic summary recommendations were made.
conclusionsAllied Health Professions Preceptorship in SSOT was found to be inconsistent, poorly understood and inadequate. Revisions to preceptorship programs across Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent NHS Trusts have been instigated to reflect changes in AHP practice since the COVID pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.