Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605099›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2024

Smoking in Popular Streaming Shows and Youth Protection in Germany.

Matthis Morgenstern, Stanton A Glantz, Clemens Neumann, Reiner Hanewinkel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthis MorgensternInstitute for Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Harmsstrasse 2, 24114, Kiel, Germany. morgenstern@ift-nord.de.
Stanton A GlantzUCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, CA, San Francisco, USA.
Clemens NeumannInstitute for Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Harmsstrasse 2, 24114, Kiel, Germany.
Reiner HanewinkelInstitute for Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Harmsstrasse 2, 24114, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

Ministry of Justice and Health of Schleswig-Holstein Ministry of Justice and Health of Schleswig-Holstein
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim was to investigate the amount of smoking in popular streaming series in Germany with a focus on the comparison between series recommended for adults versus youth. The sample was drawn from the 35 highest user-rated streaming series, that released 1794 new episodes between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2020. One-third of the episodes (N = 598) were randomly selected and analyzed for smoking content. The age ratings of these episodes ranged from 6 to 18 years, with categories of "6", "12", "16" and "18" years. Ten of the 35 shows (28.6%) were completely smoke-free, 25 shows (71.4%) had at least one episode with smoking. Of all analyzed episodes, 25.1% contained smoking (range = 1 to 36 smoking scenes; median = 4). There was a statistically significant association between episode age rating and the presence of smoking (χ

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultChildGermanyHumansSmokingAdolescentsFCTCMediaSmoking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.