ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023
Machine-Learning Algorithms Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer After Surgery.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based preoperative classification of colorectal cancer stage using systemic inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Association of body composition and nutritional status with survival in stage IV colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- An Integrative Review of Computational Methods Applied to Biomarkers, Psychological Metrics, and Behavioral Signals for Early Cancer Risk Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of Machine Learning Models in Inflammation of Unknown Origin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) change during immediate postoperative periods in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Peripheral T Lymphocyte Predicts the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of machine-learning (ML) algorithms based on serum inflammatory markers to predict survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
methodsThe study included 941 patients with stages I to III CRC. Based on random forest algorithms using 15 compositions of inflammatory markers, four different prediction scores (DFS score-1, DFS score-2, DFS score-3, and DFS score-4) were developed for the Yonsei cohort (training set, n = 803) and tested in the Ulsan cohort (test set, n = 138). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine correlation between prediction scores and disease-free survival (DFS). Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to compare the predictive ability of prediction scores for each composition.
resultsThe multivariable analysis showed the DFS score-4 to be an independent prognostic factor after adjustment for clinicopathologic factors in both the training and test sets (hazard ratio [HR], 8.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-12.04; P < 0.001 for the training set and HR, 2.55; 95% CI 1.1-5.89; P = 0.028 for the test set]. With regard to DFS, the highest C-index among single compositions was observed in the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) (0.659; 95% CI 0.656-0.662), and the C-index of DFS score-4 (0.727; 95% CI 0.724-0.729) was significantly higher than that of LCR in the test set. The C-index of DFS score-3 (0.725; 95% CI 0.723-0.728) was similar to that of DFS score-4, but higher than that of DFS score-2 (0.680; 95% CI 0.676-0.683).
conclusionsThe ML-based approaches showed prognostic utility in predicting DFS. They could enhance clinical use of inflammatory markers in patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.