Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605055›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023

Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Fibroid Expulsion After Uterine Artery Embolization.

Nathan E Frenk, Jai W Jung, Moaz M Choudhary, JiMin Ko, Donna Buckley, James B Spies

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan E FrenkDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. nathanfrenk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-9409
Jai W JungGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3175-8359
Moaz M ChoudharyDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
JiMin KoGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3104-7982
Donna BuckleyDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
James B SpiesDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-9006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate rates of fibroid expulsion after uterine artery embolization (UAE) and risk factors. MATERIALS AND

methodsSingle-center retrospective study of UAEs for fibroids between 2016 and 2020. Preoperative UAE and patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Patients underwent MRI before and 3 months after UAE and/or as indicated. Medical records were reviewed, and patient demographics, fibroid characteristics and clinical events were recorded. Fibroid expulsion included fibroid exposure to the endometrial cavity on MRI, and tissue loss/passage as observed clinically or on MRI. Symptoms were considered major if requiring additional clinic visits or treatment. Statistical tests included Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression models.

resultsOne hundred ninety-nine women were included. Symptomatic fibroid expulsion occurred after 31 (16%) procedures: 16 minor and 15 major. Symptoms included vaginal discharge (n = 23), bleeding (n = 9), tissue passage (n = 9), cramping/pain (n = 3), and fever (n = 4). Fifteen women (8%) needed additional care, of whom 6 (3%) required invasive procedures (4 elective hysterectomies, 1 hysteroscopic resection, 1 transvaginal removal of passing tissue). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification was significantly associated with symptomatic fibroid expulsion (p = 0.001). Odds ratio for symptomatic expulsion and expulsion requiring additional care for FIGO 3-7 versus 0-2 fibroids was 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.71, p = 0.005) and 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.83, p = 0.02), respectively. Other factors were not consistently associated with expulsion.

conclusionFibroid expulsion after uterine artery embolization was more common than previously reported but mostly asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. Women with FIGO ≤ 2 fibroids should be appropriately counseled regarding risk for expulsion.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaUterine Artery EmbolizationUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFibroid eliminationFibroid expulsionFibroid passageFibroid sloughingUterine artery embolizationUterine fibroid embolization

Identifiers

PMID37605055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.