Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605036›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2023

Effects of reduced nicotine content cigarette advertising with warning labels and social media features on product perceptions among young adults.

Andrea C Johnson, Melissa Mercincavage, Andy S L Tan, Andrea C Villanti, Cristine D Delnevo, Andrew A Strasser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea C JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3309, USA. andrea.johnson1@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-8927
Melissa MercincavageDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3309, USA.
Andy S L TanDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3309, USA.
Andrea C VillantiUniversity of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cristine D DelnevoUniversity of Pennsylvania-Rutgers University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrew A StrasserDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3309, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI A. Clementina Mesaros · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Tobacco Industry Marketing CoreU54CA229973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AUDRAIN-MCGOVERN, JANET E · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
Impact of Nicotine Messaging on Nicotine Beliefs and Tobacco Use BehaviorR01DA051001 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI STRASSER, ANDREW A, VILLANTI, ANDREA · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
Laboratory-based Approaches to Understanding the Impact of Low Nicotine Content Cigarette Marketing on Young AdultsK07CA218366 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERCINCAVAGE, MELISSA · 2018 to 2022
$767k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA218366NCI NIH HHS K07CA218366NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229973NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051001NIDA NIH HHS R01DA051001NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to understand reactions to very low nicotine (VLN) cigarette advertising compared with conventional cigarette advertising with consideration of warning labels and social media context. The online experimental study recruited young adult cigarette smokers and nonsmokers (N = 1,608). Participants completed a discrete choice task with a 2 × 2 × 3 mixed design: brand, (VLN, Marlboro), context (Ad only, Ad on social media), and warning (Text-only, Well-known risk pictorial, or Lesser-known risk pictorial). Participants made choices about attention, appeal, harm, buying, and quitting intentions. Social media context increased attention and appeal. A well-known risk pictorial warning outperformed a text-only warning. Smokers had increased odds of quit intentions for VLN ads, yet nonsmokers had increased intentions to buy cigarettes on social media with a text-only warning. Results indicate differences in how young adults react to cigarette ads on social media, especially with the warnings they portray.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaTobacco ProductsAdvertisingHumansNicotineProduct LabelingSmokingYoung AdultNicotineAddictionCigarettesMarketingPreventionPublic healthTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID37605036
PMCPMC10591832
OpenAlexW4386021521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.