ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Patient Characteristics and Spending Among Individuals Undergoing Ambulatory Panniculectomy and Abdominoplasty in the US from 2016 to 2019.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional Variation in Reimbursement for Body Contouring Surgery: A Claims-based Analysis across the United States.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Redefining Abdominal Contours: An Analysis of Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal contouring surgery can provide both functional and cosmetic benefits to patients with abdominal soft tissue laxity. Although these procedures have been studied in the inpatient setting, few studies describe abdominal contouring surgery in the ambulatory setting.
objectiveThe purpose of this analysis was to investigate patterns in patient demographics between functional panniculectomy and cosmetic abdominoplasty using national data from the last four years.
methodsUsing the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample, we analyzed outpatient abdominal contouring procedures between 2016 and 2019. Encounters with a CPT 15830 were included. Procedures with ICD Z41.1 or CPT 15847 modifiers were defined as cases of cosmetic abdominoplasty.
resultsA weighted estimate of 95,289 encounters were included, with 66,531 (69.8%) functional panniculectomy and 28,758 (30.2%) cosmetic abdominoplasty procedures. Among patients with a history of bariatric surgery (23.8%; 95% CI, 22.3-25.4%), there was a 28.5% (4,866 in 2016 vs 6,254 in 2019) increase in panniculectomy and abdominoplasty. Compared with individuals who underwent cosmetic abdominoplasty, individuals who underwent functional panniculectomy were more racially diverse, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to be from low-income backgrounds.
conclusionsRates of abdominal contouring surgery in the ambulatory setting have increased in recent years especially among individuals with previous bariatric surgery. There are important demographic and clinical differences between patients who underwent functional panniculectomy and cosmetic abdominoplasty including primary payer, comorbidities, and racial identity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.