Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37605018›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

"No-back-scar" Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap and Tissue Expander: A Valuable Strategy for Secondary Breast Reconstructions.

Vincenzo Bucaria, Giuseppe Giudice, Alessandra Boccuzzi, Ilaria Converti, Michele Maruccia, Rossella Elia

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincenzo BucariaUnit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, 10 v. Samuel F Hahnemann, 70125, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe GiudiceUnit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 11, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Alessandra BoccuzziUnit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, 10 v. Samuel F Hahnemann, 70125, Bari, Italy.
Ilaria ConvertiUnit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, 10 v. Samuel F Hahnemann, 70125, Bari, Italy.
Michele MarucciaUnit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 11, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Rossella EliaUnit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 11, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 70124, Bari, Italy. rossellaelia4@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6094-5159
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An overall complication rates for implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) have been reported from 29 to 46%, particularly in the setting of adjuvant radiotherapy. Although the majority of the literature describes autologous conversion in such scenario, a microsurgical flap is not always feasible. The aim of the paper is to assess surgical and patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction using a Latissimus Dorsi muscle Flap (LDMF), harvested without a back scar, in combination with a tissue expander for a two-staged reconstruction in the setting of a previously failed IBBR. All consecutive patients undergoing a two-stages LDMF IBBR between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively identified. A minimal length vertical incision along the posterior axillary line was used for LD flap harvest. Demographic, clinical and surgical data were collected. Aesthetic outcome was evaluated with the Aesthetic Item Scale, and BREAST-Q was used to assess patients' reported outcomes. Twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 45.6 years, and the average follow-up was 41.2 months after tissue expander replacement with definitive implant. All patients completed the secondary reconstructive procedure, without major complications both at reconstructive and donor flap site. All women reported to be very satisfied with the final breast reconstruction. Second-attempt implant-based breast reconstruction for patients with a previously failed IBBR is challenging. A conversion from prosthetic to a mixed breast reconstruction with a "no-back scar" LD flap and tissue expander can be considered as a valuable strategy, especially when an abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction is not feasible or refused by the patients.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastySuperficial Back MusclesSurgical FlapsTissue ExpansionTissue Expansion DevicesAdultBreast ImplantationCicatrixEstheticsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionLatissimus dorsiSalvage breast reconstructionTertiary breast reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37605018
OpenAlexW4386022087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.