Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604980›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Pier Francesco Caruso, Cecilia Åkerlund, Lindsay Wilson, Robert D Stevens, David K Menon, Ewout W Steyerberg, David W Nelson, Ari Ercole, CENTER-TBI investigators and participants

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Machine Learning Approaches to Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  7. ASA score is an independent predictor of 1-year outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shubhayu BhattacharyayDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. sb2406@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-5588
Pier Francesco CarusoDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0839-4396
Cecilia ÅkerlundDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-1482
Lindsay WilsonDivision of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Robert D StevensLaboratory of Computational Intensive Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David K MenonDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-9692
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-0122
David W NelsonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ari ErcoleDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-8093
CENTER-TBI investigators and participants

Funding

EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Health (FP7-HEALTH - Specific Programme "Cooperation": Health) 602150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing methods to characterise the evolving condition of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) do not capture the context necessary for individualising treatment. Here, we integrate all heterogenous data stored in medical records (1166 pre-ICU and ICU variables) to model the individualised contribution of clinical course to 6-month functional outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale -Extended (GOSE). On a prospective cohort (n = 1550, 65 centres) of TBI patients, we train recurrent neural network models to map a token-embedded time series representation of all variables (including missing values) to an ordinal GOSE prognosis every 2 h. The full range of variables explains up to 52% (95% CI: 50-54%) of the ordinal variance in functional outcome. Up to 91% (95% CI: 90-91%) of this explanation is derived from pre-ICU and admission information (i.e., static variables). Information collected in the ICU (i.e., dynamic variables) increases explanation (by up to 5% [95% CI: 4-6%]), though not enough to counter poorer overall performance in longer-stay (>5.75 days) patients. Highest-contributing variables include physician-based prognoses, CT features, and markers of neurological function. Whilst static information currently accounts for the majority of functional outcome explanation after TBI, data-driven analysis highlights investigative avenues to improve the dynamic characterisation of longer-stay patients. Moreover, our modelling strategy proves useful for converting large patient records into interpretable time series with missing data integration and minimal processing.

Identifiers

PMID37604980
PMCPMC10442346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.