Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604959›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Mouth and facial informativeness norms for 2276 English words.

Anna Krason, Ye Zhang, Hillarie Man, Gabriella Vigliocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Krason *Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H, 0AP, UK. anna.krason.15@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-3584
Ye Zhang *Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H, 0AP, UK. y.zhang.16@ucl.ac.uk.
Hillarie ManDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H, 0AP, UK.
Gabriella ViglioccoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H, 0AP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouth and facial movements are part and parcel of face-to-face communication. The primary way of assessing their role in speech perception has been by manipulating their presence (e.g., by blurring the area of a speaker's lips) or by looking at how informative different mouth patterns are for the corresponding phonemes (or visemes; e.g., /b/ is visually more salient than /g/). However, moving beyond informativeness of single phonemes is challenging due to coarticulation and language variations (to name just a few factors). Here, we present mouth and facial informativeness (MaFI) for words, i.e., how visually informative words are based on their corresponding mouth and facial movements. MaFI was quantified for 2276 English words, varying in length, frequency, and age of acquisition, using phonological distance between a word and participants' speechreading guesses. The results showed that MaFI norms capture well the dynamic nature of mouth and facial movements per word, with words containing phonemes with roundness and frontness features, as well as visemes characterized by lower lip tuck, lip rounding, and lip closure being visually more informative. We also showed that the more of these features there are in a word, the more informative it is based on mouth and facial movements. Finally, we demonstrated that the MaFI norms generalize across different variants of English language. The norms are freely accessible via Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/mna8j/ ) and can benefit any language researcher using audiovisual stimuli (e.g., to control for the effect of speech-linked mouth and facial movements).

Indexed as

MouthAdultFaceFemaleHumansLanguageLipLipreadingMalePhoneticsSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultMouth and facial movementsVisual informativenessWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID37604959
PMCPMC11289175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.