ArticleRheumatology international2023
Clinical features of Behçet's disease and prediction of the use of biologics in 488 cases: a single tertiary center study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glymphatic dysfunction as a potential mechanistic link to cognitive ımpairment in Behçet's disease: a hypothesis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of cytokine levels and peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets in systemic vascular inflammatory disease.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Demographics and clinical manifestations in patients with Behçet's disease: a retrospective observational study from a non-endemic country.Rheumatology international · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives are to describe the demographic and clinical properties of Behçet's disease (BD) and investigate their relationship with the use of biological agents. Four hundred-eighty-eight patients, (299 (61.3%) males, 189 (38.7%) females), who fulfilled the ISG classification criteria for BD were included, retrospectively. The patient's demographics, disease onset age (DOA), clinical findings of the disease, and the drugs were determined and analyzed statistically. The means of patient age and DOA were 40.7 ± 9.9 and 30.8 ± 8.8 years, respectively. The most common initial findings were oral ulcer (OU)s (30.1%), genital ulcer (GU) (27.5%), ocular involvement (OI) (12.5%), and papulopustular lesion (PPL)s (10.1%). The most common clinical manifestations were OUs (96.9%), PPLs (70.2%), HLA-B51 (64.4%), positive pathergy reaction (26.4%), GU (58.8%), OI (44.7%), erythema nodosum (29.8%), and vascular involvement (VSI) (27.3%). Although, the frequency of GU was higher in females (p = 0.01), PPLs (p = 0.001) and VSI (p = 0.001) were higher in males. Sixty-three (8.9%) patients used a biological agent. Its frequency was higher in younger patients (< 40 years) (p = 0.006), males (p = 0.012) and patients with OI (p = 0.001). Besides, the DOA (p = 0.012) and the current age (p = 0.001) were lower in biological agent users. The possibility of using biological agent was increased in males (OR = 2.2), patients with OI (OR = 2.7) and young patients (OR = 0.9). Mucocutaneous lesions are distinctive features of BD, especially OUs precede other findings. GU was more common in females and PPLs and VSI were in males. The probability of using biologics is higher in males, patients with OI, and young patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.