Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604595›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2023

Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment by Australian early-career general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

Toby Morgan, Anna Ralston, Andrew Davey, Elizabeth G Holliday, Mark Nelson, Alison Fielding, Mieke van Driel, Amanda Tapley, Dominica Moad, Jean Ball and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can we better prevent cardiovascular disease? 'Stayin' healthy to stay alive'.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Toby MorganSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna RalstonNSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy Ltd - Newcastle, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew DaveyNSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy Ltd - Newcastle, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth G HollidaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark NelsonUniversity of Tasmania Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Alison FieldingNSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy Ltd - Newcastle, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia.
Mieke van DrielGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amanda TapleyNSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy Ltd - Newcastle, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia.
Dominica MoadNSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy Ltd - Newcastle, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia.
Jean BallClinical Research Design and Statistical Support Unit (CReDITSS), The University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer PresserUniversity of Tasmania School of Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Neil SpikeDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Parker MaginNSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, GP Synergy Ltd - Newcastle, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia parker.magin@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-8749
University of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prevalence and associations of general practice registrars' performing absolute cardio-vascular risk (ACVR) assessment (ACVRa).

designA cross-sectional study employing data (2017-2018) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training project, an ongoing inception cohort study of Australian GP registrars. The outcome measure was whether an ACVRa was performed. Analyses employed univariable and multivariable regression. Analysis was conducted for all patient problems/diagnoses, then for an 'at-risk' population (specific problems/diagnoses for which ACVRa is indicated).

settingThree GP regional training organisations (RTOs) across three Australian states.

participantsGP registrars training within participating RTOs.

results1003 registrars (response rate 96.8%) recorded details of 69 105 problems either with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait patients aged 35 years and older or with non-Indigenous patients aged 45 years and older. Of these problems/diagnoses, 1721 (2.5% (95% CI 2.4% to 2.6%)) involved an ACVRa. An ACVRa was 'plausibly indicated' in 10 384 problems/diagnoses. Of these, 1228 (11.8% (95% CI 11.2% to 12.4%)) involved ACVRa. For 'all problems/diagnoses', on multivariable analysis female gender was associated with reduced odds of ACVRa (OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.68)). There was some evidence for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people being more likely to receive ACVRa (OR 1.40 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.08), p=0.10). There were associations with variables related to continuity of care, with reduced odds of ACVRa: if the patient was new to the registrar (OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.75)), new to the practice (OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.38)) or the problem was new (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.78)); and increased odds if personal follow-up was organised (OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.66)). For 'ACVRa indicated' problems/diagnoses, findings were similar to those for 'all problems/diagnoses'. Association with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander status, however, was significant at p<0.05 (OR 1.60 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.46)) and association with female gender was attenuated (OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.01)).

conclusionContinuity of care is associated with registrars assessing ACVR, reinforcing the importance of care continuity in general practice. Registrars' assessment of an individual patient's ACVR is targeted to patients with individual risk factors, but this may entail ACVRa underutilisation in female patients and younger age groups.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesGeneral PractitionersAustraliaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk Factorscardiovascular diseasesgeneral practicephysicians, family

Identifiers

PMID37604595
PMCPMC10445344
OpenAlexW4386034775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.